Race Report: Cayuga Trails 50 Mile

Pre-race, with part of Team MPF/RNR.
photo: Elizabeth Azze

I don't really have the heart to delve too deeply into recapping last weekend's Cayuga Trails 50 mile.  Plus there isn't much to tell, so I'll keep this post brief.

The buildup to my third USATF national championship race of 2016 went as well as I could have hoped.  Following the two 50Ks I ran in March, I took a week off of running completely before starting up again at the beginning of April.  I was soon running 85-90 mpw, and continued to build up to a peak of 130 miles in mid-May, towards the end of a 10-week block of over 1000 miles.  I was running strong track and hill workouts with Laura, and had long runs with Phil of 35+ miles at sub-9:00 pace.  I had Elizabeth come by and beef up my core routine.  I got down to race weight with two weeks to go before race day.  Things could not have gone better.

Eight days before race day, Phil and I were out for an easy two hours, the last "long" run of the training cycle.  It was warm, but not too warm; nothing close to the near-90s I had battled with Laura on the track the night before.  The first part of the run went quite well; as we climbed up our usual trail to the Mohonk Preserve, I felt ridiculously strong and relaxed.  But about an hour in I started to feel poorly.  I suddenly felt flushed and achy, particularly in my neck, shoulders, and upper back; as we started back down the hill for home, I was exhausted.  A little less than a mile from home, I got very weak and lightheaded, to the point that I stopped and sat by the side of the road for about five minutes before I felt well enough to jog the last few minutes home.  Unfortunately I was intimately familiar with these symptoms--it felt just like my previous episodes of Lyme disease.

Panic mode quickly set in.  It was Friday afternoon; I couldn't get a Lyme test for at least a couple of days, and having had a positive antibody test in the past, I wasn't sure whether a blood test would be useful anyway.  I dug through the medicine cabinet and found an old course of doxycycline that I started immediately.  If this really was Lyme, maybe I could get on top of it with enough antibiotics in the upcoming week to feel normal by race day.

Over the next few days, I convinced myself I was feeling better.  My legs certainly didn't have the pep of even just a few days previously, but I chalked that up to a combination of the taper blues and the heat wave that gripped the east coast, ensuring all my runs took place at a humid 85 degrees.  Laura and I ran our last track tuneup on Tuesday; 2 x 1 mile at 5:50, which felt aerobically fine but significantly achier than I expected.  It was still awfully hot, though, and I kept telling myself my legs would come around.

After an uneventful trip to Ithaca on Friday and a restless night of sleep Friday night, I headed off with Phil at the back of the lead pack Saturday morning at 6am.  The field was incredibly deep, even for a national championship; much deeper than we had raced at Bandera.  My goal was a sub-8:00 finish, which I figured would be in the back part of the top-15.  With the stacked field up front, I was banking on the top contenders beating each other up a bit; enough carnage (which is usually the case at Cayuga) and a smart race and I might sneak into the top 10.  I wanted to run the first 25-mile lap near my 2015 split of 3:50; while that had been a bit too fast for me to handle last year, I knew with my fitness level that I could comfortably come through halfway at 3:50 and have a strong second lap in me.

The race started out as quickly as I expected; despite passing through AS 1 (uphill 5K) in 27:00, just 30 seconds slower than last year, Phil and I had at least 40 runners ahead of us, including the top five women.  We reassured ourselves that we were being smart, and ran a very relaxed tempo, keying off Sabrina Little about thirty seconds in front of us, chatting easily.  It was a bit humid but not uncomfortable, and it seemed like I was having a good day.  We passed AS 2 (7+ miles) in 1:01:30, two minutes slower than 2015 (when I had run that segment way too fast) and about three minutes faster than my 2013 split.

The miles passed by easily enough as we climbed up the Lick Brook gorge and made our way over to Buttermilk Falls.  We caught Sabrina about 10 miles in and ran together down to Buttermilk and AS 3 in 1:52--again, two minutes slower than 2015.  Phil and Sabrina both stopped to refill bottles while I ran straight through the aid station.  My stomach felt great, energy levels were good, legs fine as we started climbing back out of the gorge for the return trip.

Climbing out of Buttermilk Falls.
photo: Elizabeth Azze

About ten minutes past the aid station, nearing the top of the Buttermilk Falls stairs, I noticed the first hints that things were not going as planned.  The pace hadn't changed, but somehow the effort level had spiked considerably.  In fact, I was having to slow down to keep the effort level steady, especially on the climbs--not unusual, except for the fact that I was only two hours into an eight hour race and had no reason to feel this way.  Picking my way through some navigable single track, I noticed that my pace had dropped off significantly, and my legs were starting to ache much more than I expected at this point in the race.  I chalked it up to a bad patch and took an extra GU, but within a mile Phil, Sabrina, and a group of about four other runners had caught up with me and passed by as we started to step drop down Lick Brook towards AS 4.  I fell in with Phil, telling myself it was way too early to worry about racing for places now, and focused on staying relaxed.  I re-passed everyone in the aid station, as once again I blew through while they all stopped to refill bottles, but again, I was re-caught fairly quickly.

By the time we reached the base of Lucifer's staircase, about 20 miles in, I was struggling, already walking many of the smaller uphills.  I wasn't losing ground--in fact, I still had a slight lead on Phil/Sabrina et. al.--but I certainly wasn't moving well.  At the top of the stairs, I felt as though I was forty miles in instead of twenty.  Nothing hurt, really; I was just exhausted, and I couldn't imagine continuing on for another five hours.  We continued our usual pattern at AS 5, as I opened up a small lead over my nearest companions by forgoing aid, and was once again caught about a mile later.  By this time I had made the decision to drop, and I told Sabrina and Phil as much.  They were both a little surprised, but too wrapped up in what they had to do to try to change my mind, not that it would have mattered much.

I reached the start/finish at 3:58 and pulled the plug.  It was incredibly frustrating.  I wasn't hurt, my stomach was fine; I was hydrating and taking nutrition without a problem.  I just knew I couldn't run another 25 miles.  I could have jogged and walked, very slowly, and finished.  It would have taken me a minimum of six hours for the second half of the race.  I just didn't have it in me.

Eventually I hooked up with Brian, got out on the course to help support Dylan as he gutted out a tough fourth-place finish; commiserated with Cole and Iain in our mutual DNF disappointments; and got to cheer in a lot of great finishes from teammates and friends in both the 50-mile and the marathon; the list of courageous and inspiring performances is too long to get into here.  But there's only so much fun you can have at the finish line of a race you've just dropped out of, and it's been a pity party on this end for the last several days.

With Jason and Laura, who both did it right.
photo: Elizabeth Azze

The drive home that night was brutal; I had a splitting headache and felt nauseous most of the way, further reinforcing my feelings that it's once again Lyme I'm dealing with, though who the hell knows.  I'm about two weeks into antibiotics at this point and feeling minimally better.  Had blood work done two days ago, so stay tuned on that end.

I'm a bit unmoored right now.  This disaster of a race experience has shaken the confidence quite a bit, especially in light of the fact that I don't feel much better almost a week later.  As crappy as a DNF feels, I'm no stranger to the experience, and after a little self-reflection and rationalization I can usually refocus pretty quickly on what I need to do moving forward.  But right now the uncertainty is making that almost impossible.  The goal is to be ready for the fall racing season--I've basically given up on an summer racing at this point--but without knowing when or how I'm going to get back into training seriously, I'm finding a positive outlook tough to come by.


On Tapering

I'd be hard-pressed to identify any aspect of my life with which I have a more love-hate relationship than tapering.  (Chocolate?  The Mets?  My progeny?)  As I start approaching the end of a big training block, the cumulative effect of volume starts to take its toll, and there are days when I long for a reduction in mileage.  Last week, finishing up an eight-week, 850+ mile buildup for Cayuga Trails, I had at least two days where I barely had the motivation to put my shorts on.  On those days, the idea of a taper feels like a godsend.

Invariably, though, a few days into the taper, doubts start to creep in.  Sleeping seems to get harder.  Little aches and pains that otherwise would have been dismissed as the byproduct of hard, sustained training take on an outsized importance.  Every physical sensation is dissected and analyzed, usually with depressing conclusions.  Rather than feeling energized, I often start feeling more sluggish.  Even good days, where energy levels are high, leave me feeling twitchy and on edge.

This is certainly not new, and I'm certainly not unique in this way.  Almost everyone who's been through a taper for a big race has similar complaints and conflicted feelings about it.  Much of the problem is that there is no single formula for tapering.  Everyone reacts differently to a reduction in training, and every individual taper is a little different, based on the length and intensity of the preceding training block.  Some people like a three-week taper, some one or two.  Some even eschew it altogether.  Personally I prefer a 10-14 day taper; anything longer than that for me and self-doubt really starts to creep in.  Some other general rules I try to follow:

Drop the volume by about 30% each week.  In a two-week taper that means cutting mileage to about 2/3 of what I had been running previously, then about 1/3 in the week leading up to the race.  This has to be adjusted sometimes, particularly if the volume has been high.  The last three weeks of my training block this time around were 115, 130, and 115 miles; a reduction of 1/3 would take me from about 120 miles to 80 miles.  Eighty miles is still a fair amount, though, and I'll probably wind up with more like 65 or 70 this week, before dropping down to about 35 the week before the race.

Cut back on volume, not intensity.  In my younger days I would reduce not only the workload but the "quality" of my runs as well, sometimes eliminating hard workouts in the ten days leading up to the race.  I can unequivocally say this made me feel much, much worse.  Now I'll continue to do workouts during the taper of similar intensity to those previously, usually just with less mileage or fewer repeats on the track.  I like the concept of "race-specific" workouts as I get closer to an event, but this is difficult for an ultra, where goal pace is aerobic and not terribly taxing in short intervals.  Instead I'll run a low-volume, moderate intensity marathon-pace workout in the week leading up to the race.  Last night Laura and I ran 4 x 800m with 200m easy jog recovery:


(and if you think this whole post wasn't just an excuse to show that video, you're crazy.)

Hydrate.  I don't eliminate caffeine--I'm not sure how functional I'd be, particularly on overnight shifts at work--but I'm more cognizant of drinking water in the several days beforehand.

Don't do anything stupid.  This mostly applies to overdoing it from a running perspective.  Now isn't the time to chase KOMs on Strava because I want to take advantage of my fitness, even if they are short ones.  It also refers to the myriad other ways I can damage my race without thinking about it.  I remember injuring a toe playing barefoot volleyball in a neighbor's yard a week before the Vermont 50 in 2010.

Don't overreact when you feel bad.  This is the hardest one to follow, since invariably several times during the taper I'm going to have runs where I feel sluggish and out of sorts.  It's very easy to let the self-doubt creep in.  You have to keep reminding yourself of the training that preceded the taper, and that you're not all of a sudden out of shape.  It sounds easy but it isn't.

Right now, for example, I'm actually freaking out over how I felt this morning on my last "long" run (a relaxed 14-miler with Phil).  My legs are fine, but over the second half of the run I got very achy, in all my muscles, particularly my back and arms.  I'm trying not to overreact, but this is how I've felt in the past during my two episodes of Lyme disease, and the achiness has persisted throughout the day.  Hopefully it's just the taper blues.  I know my fitness level is very good; my confidence in my training is high.  But you can bet your ass I'm on doxycycline right now.  Fingers crossed.

I should have "get extra sleep" on this list, but I can't in good conscience include it.  Not because I think it isn't important--it's likely more important than anything else I have on here--but because though I'd like to make this a focus of my taper, the unpredictability of my work schedule means this is usually out of my control.  Working a mixture of 12-hour day shifts and night shifts with a 35-minute commute, with the kids' activities crammed in, means that 8-9 hours of sleep in between shifts is often an impossibility.  Instead I'll try to increase my nap frequency when leading into a race, which isn't ideal but at least makes me feel like I'm being mindful of my recovery.

Race Report: Spring Dual Against CF Kids' Race


The girls had their second go at the Spring Dual Against CF a couple of weeks ago.  They learned their lesson after going out a bit too hard last year, and both of them tried to pace themselves.  Dylan was easily the youngest one there, which made it difficult for her to keep up, but she did take home the win as the only finisher in the 7-10 age group (though Lexi is 10, USAT rules dictate she race as an 11-year-old, as she turns 11 in November).

****************************************************

This was my second time doing the duathlon, and at the beginning, I was really exited, but also a little nervous. - I was really nervous, but also a little excited. - At the beginning, I was falling behind everyone, but I kept a steady pace. - Me too, but I was having a little trouble keeping a steady pace, because I wanted to be a little more ahead. - I felt pretty good during the biking, and I passed a few people. - Same. - During the last run, I started feeling exhausted, but I didn't sprint until the end. - Me too, but I was feeling a little more exhausted, and I couldn't sprint at the end. - After the race, I was feeling pretty good! - After the race I was very, very, very tired. Dad said that I was hyperventilating.

--Lexi and Dylan











Gunksrunner Ultra Rankings: First 2016 Update

Women's #1 YiOu Wang
photo: Trail Runner Magazine

With the first third of the year gone, and summer racing season just around the corner, it's time to check in with the Gunkrunner Ultra Rankings.

Regular readers (what are you people doing with your lives?) will remember that the GUR began last year as my attempt to provide an objective ranking of the top ultrarunners in the US.  Using the World Golf Rankings as a model, I devised a formula that accounts for field size, field strength, race prestige/importance, and head-to-head competition.  How successful it was is open to debate, but I was pleased with the results the first time around, and so I continued it with some minor tweaks for 2016.

It's a little early in the year for the results to be very meaningful as yet.  Many of the top runners have barely opened their campaigns; neither of last year's UROY (David Laney and Magdalena Boulet) has raced an ultra yet this year, and most of the biggest races on the calendar are still to come.  But with the Golden Ticket races completed, as well as the first major showdown of the year at Lake Sonoma, some early trends are taking shape.

Men's #1 Jim Walmsley
photo: Ultrarunner Podcast
To nobody's surprise, Jim Walmsley is dominating the men's ranking to this point, with more than double the points of second-ranked Ian Sharman.  Jim has won four races already this year, including major wins at Sonoma, Bandera, and Moab.  The Sonoma women's winner, YiOu Wang, also comfortably leads the women's rankings.  The men's point totals in the top 25 are easily outpacing those of their female counterparts, reflecting that many of the top-ranked men have raced more often, and more frequently against each other, than the leading women.  (This effect disappears among those ranked 26-50, where the point totals are nearly identical for men and women.)

You'll notice that the point totals are much higher this year than in 2015.   The reason is twofold.  First (and most importantly) the point values for level 4 and 5 races have been increased significantly from 2015, lending these races more weight.  Secondly, I'm using last year's top 50 to calculate field strength (as opposed to only the top 10 last year), so the field strength multipliers are more frequent and more robust.

You may also notice there are no more international runners in the rankings.  I've decided to limit this only to North American runners.  I've been trying to be more inclusive of overseas races this year, as many of the top US runners are travelling abroad to compete, and the UTWT takes on more importance domestically.  However that exposes me to many, many more international runners, and keeping track of them was becoming untenable.  Plus, it wasn't like I was doing a good job of capturing their results last year, and the rankings that Killian, Francois, Gediminus, etc. were receiving was not at all reflective of any sort of reality.  So, North Americans only right now, though I'm still using Gediminius' ranking (and Emma Roca on the women's side) from last year to calculate field strength when he shows up.

A side benefit of this fact is that the GUR are now a little more in sync with the Ultrarunning UROY criteria.  I'm thrilled that this year I've been able to partner with Ultrarunning; the GUR now has a permanent home on their website, so you can view updated rankings in real time whenever you feel like I'm being too slow publishing them.

Top 50 (as of 5/5/16) below; check out the full list here.



Men
State
Points
Women
State
Points
1
Jim Walmsley
AZ
159
YiOu Wang
CA
94
2
Ian Sharman
CA
72.5
Bethany Patterson
VA
56.8
3
Mario Mendoza
OR
59.9
Kaci Lickteig
NE
47.9
4
Paul Terranova
TX
58
Cassie Scallon
CO
45.1
5
Christopher Dennucci
CA
55.675
Anna Mae Flynn
CA
44.3
6
Tim Freriks
AZ
55
Ellie Greenwood
Can
40
7
Dylan Bowman
CA
47.6
Keely Henninger
OR
38
8
David Roche
CA
47.5
Jodee Adams-Moore
WA
37.5
9
Jesse Haynes
CA
46.7
Caroline Boller
CA
35
10
Andrew Miller
OR
45
Sabrina Little
TX
35
11
Matt Flaherty
IN
42.6
Amy Rusiecki
MA
31.1
12
Chris Mocko
CA
41.625
Emily Peterson
CA
31
13
Brian Rusiecki
MA
41.55
Devon Yanko
CA
30
14
Michael Daigeaun
PA
40
Megan Roche
CA
30
15
Masazuma Fujioka
WA
39
Denise Bourassa
OR
28.8
16
Ed Ettinghausen
CA38.4
Sarah Schubert
VA
28.6
17
Ryan Bak
OR37.5
Julie Koepke
TX
28.175
18
Zach Miller
CO35
Nicole Kalogeropoulos
TX
28
19
Daniel Metzger
CA
34.5
Rachel Ragona
CA
27
20
Jorge Pacheco
CA
32.8
Bev Anderson-Abbs
CA
26
21
Stephen Wassather
CA
31.5
Amy Sproston
OR
25.5
22
Jared Burdick
NY
28.5
Camille Herron
OK
24.7
23
Charlie Ware
AZ
28.5
Janessa Taylor
OR
24.5
24
Jorge Maravilla
CA
28.5
Kathleen Cusick
FL
24.5
25
Caleb Denton
TN
27
Amy Clark
TX
24.25
26
Karl Meltzer
UT
24.3
Anne-Marie Maddon
Can
24
27
Jeremy Wolf
WA
23.675
Kelly Wolf
AZ
23.2
28
Nicholas DiPirro
VA
22.5
Laura Kline
NY
23
29
Sage Canaday
CO
22.5
Amanda Basham
OR
22.5
30
Jeff Browning
OR
21.5
Brittany Goicoechea
ID
22.5
31
Dominick Layfield
UT
21.4
Natalie Larson
CA
21.5
32
Chikara Omine
CA
21
Corinne Malcolm
WA
21.25
33
Brett Hornig
OR
20.65
Maggie Guterl
PA
21
34
Troy Shellhamer
KY
20
Traci Falbo
IN
21
35
Zach Bitter
CA
19.7
Alicia Hudelson
GA
20.475
36
Chris Roberts
DC
19.2
Katrin Silva
NM
20
37
Yassine Diboun
OR
19.2
Jennifer Pfeifer
CA
19.2
38
Darren Thomas
VA
19
Heather Hoecsht
PA
19
39
Mark Hammond
UT
19
Kaytlyn Gerbin
WA
18.875
40
Ryan Neely
CA
19
Kait Sheridan
NY
18.5
41
Benjamin Koss
CA
18.9
Kathryn Drew
Can
18.2
42
Ryan Ghelfi
OR
18.5
Jameelah Mujaahid
GA
18
43
Jason Friedman
NY
18.05
Rebecca Watters
GA
17.3
44
C Fred Joslyn
NY
18
Deysi Osegueda
CA
17.1
45
Brian Miller
CA
17.75
Alissa St. Laurent
Can
16.5
46
Coree Woltering
CO
17.5
Megan Stegemiller
VA
16.5
47
Michael Owen
OH
17.25
Christina Clark
Can
16.3
48
Kevin Moore
CA
17.2
Alician Rich
IN
16
49
Aaron Saft
NC
17
Cait Morgan
CT
16
50
Jeremy Humphrey
ID
17
Sarah Bard
WA
16

Will Swenson
MA
17




Ryan Atkins
Can
17



Running Resume




Running Background

High School: Clarkstown High School North (NY) 1989-93
Twice All-State, Four-time All-Section, Seven-time All-County in XC and track
Track and XC team captain, 1990-3
College: Cornell University (NY) 1993-7
Varsity XC, 1996; Varsity track, 1995-7
Brooks/Haddonfield Running Company (NJ) 2001-2007
Inov-8 Pro Deal Team, 2011

Mountain/Ultra/Trail Results

2016
Bandera 100K (US Championships): 9:23, 6th overall, 2nd Masters
Caumsett 50K (US Championships): 3:30, 13th overall, 3rd age group
Canyon Meadow 50K, Oakland, CA: 1st overall (4:22, #7 all-time)

2015
Water Gap 50K, Milford, OA: 3:57, 3rd overall, 1st Masters
Recover From the Holidays 50K, Staatsburg, NY: 348, 1st overall
Mount Mitchell Challenge, Black Mountain, NC: 5:33, 5th overall
Prospect Mountain Uphill Race, Lake George, NY: 2nd overall
Cayuga Trails 50 Mile (US Championships), Ithaca, NY: 8:40, 26th overall
Whiteface Vertical Kilometer, Wilmington, NY: 18th overall
Whiteface Sky Marathon, Wilmington, NY: 17th overall

2014
Mount Mitchell Challenge, Black Mountain, NC: 5:44, 6th overall
Survival Race, New Windsor, NY: 1st overall
Whiteface Mountain Uphill Race, Wilmington, NY: 4th overall
Shawangunk Ridge Trail Run 50K, Rosendale, NY: 2nd overall
Tesla Hertz Run 50K, Rocky Point, NY: 1st overall, 4:08:20 (course record)

2013
Recover From the Holidays 50K, Staatsburg, NY: 3:32, 1st overall
Rock the Ridge 50 Mile, New Paltz, NY: 7:29, 4th overall
Cayuga Trails 50 Mile, Ithaca, NY: 8:48, 16th overall
Great Cranberry Island 50K, ME: 4:01, 9th overall

2012
Blues Cruise Ultra (50K trail), Leesport, PA: 4:01, 6th overall
Whiteface Mountain Hill Climb, Whiteface, NY: 2nd overall
Wakely Dam Ultra (55K trail), NY: 6th overall
Warrior Dash-New York, Windham, NY: 1st overall

2011
Mount Mitchell Challenge, Black Mountain, NC: 5:18, 5th overall
Recover From the Holidays 50K, Staatsburg, NY: 3:53, 1st overall
North Face Endurance Challenge 50K, Bear Mountain, NY: 4th overall
Traprock 50K, CT: 4th overall
Warrior Dash-New York, Windham, NY: 5th overall
Gunks Trails Challenge, New Paltz, NY: 2nd overall

2010
Vermont 50 Mile, Brownsville, VT: 7:31, 9th overall
Virgil Mountain Monster Marathon, Virgil, NY: 4:00, 1st overall
Savoy Mountain Trail Race (22mi), Savoy, MA: 3:30, 5th overall
Sybil Ludington 50K, Carmel, NY: 3:51, 3rd overall
Mount Penn Mudfest 15K (trail), Reading, PA: 10th overall
Warrior Dash-New York, Windham, NY: 4th overall

2009
North Face Endurance Challenge 50K, Bear Mountain, NY: 5th overall
909 Trail Marathon, Pleasant Valley, NY: 1st overall
Mount Penn Mudfest 15K (trail), Reading, PA: 3rd overall

2008
Caumsett 50K (US Championships), Lloyd Harbor, NY: 3:25, 6th overall
Mount Penn Mudfest 15K (trail), Reading, PA: 6th overall


Coaching Experience
Guest speaker, Mohonk Triathlon Camp, 2009-11
Run leader, Mohonk Hikers’/Trail Running Week, 2012
Founder and co-director, Shawangunk Running Camp (2006-8)
Assistant Mens’ and Womens’ XC Coach, SUNY-New Paltz, 2007-8; volunteer assistant, 2008-10
Assistant coach, Ithaca HS XC, 1995
Recreation director/run leader, Smoky Mountain Running Camp, Asheville, NC, 1996-8
Recreation director/run leader, Green Mountain Running Camp, Lyndonville, VT, 1996-8

Running/medical

Head Physician, Survival of the Shawangunks Triathlon, 2006-present
Volunteer physician at Western States Endurance Run, Manitou’s Revenge Ultra, Cat’s Tail Trail Marathon

Other running-related interests/accomplishments

Co-owner, Shawangunk Running Company (running specialty store), New Paltz, NY, 2008-10
Author, “Confessions of an Ultramarathon Skeptic,” Marathon and Beyond magazine, Nov/Dec 2007 (view at http://www.marathonandbeyond.com/choices/Friedman.pdf)
Author, “Townsmen of the Stiller Town,” Marathon and Beyond magazine, Nov/Dec 2008
Featured in “Where the Sidewalk Ends” by Josh Dean, Runner’s World, Oct 2010 (view at http://www.runnersworld.com/article/1,7124,s6-238-511-0-13667-0,00.html)

Guest on Ultrarunner Podcast, August 2014 (listen at http://ultrarunnerpodcast.com/jay-friedman-md-interview/)

Team inov-8: Coming Home

Quite possibly my favorite shoe of all time.
Last year I partnered up with Salming, a Swedish sporting-goods company which broke in to the domestic running shoe market in late 2014.  I felt very lucky to be included among their first crop of sponsored athletes in the US, and I put in many happy miles in the Trail T1 and the Race, an ultra lightweight road-racing shoe.  I greatly enjoyed my relationship with the company and I'm thankful for the support they give me, and I stand by their shoes, which are of excellent quality.

I'm thrilled to announce, however, that at long last I'll be rejoining Team inov-8 in 2016.  Inov-8 was the first company to take a chance on me, back in 2011.  Over the past few years, their team has moved in a number of different directions, as have I.  I couldn't be happier that we've found our way back together.

Inov-8 is known overseas as the industry leader in the absolutely insane niche of our sport known as fell running.  In the last few years they've expanded into orienteering, road running, and Cross Fit; but the trails remain their bread and butter.  They make shoes that are lightweight, flexible yet supportive, with incredible traction, and across a wide range of heel-toe differentials.  There is a shoe for every ultra runner in the inov-8 line.  Usually more than one.

The inov-8 team has seen many accomplished runners come and go, both in the US and internationally.  I'm the first to admit that I'm not on the level of many--maybe any--of my teammates, or even on the same level as many of the runners who are no longer associated with the team.  I'm under no illusion that this is a purely, or even mostly, performance-based relationship.  Whatever middling ability I've cultivated as a writer--and my willingness to contribute my writing to the inov-8 blog--is a major part (maybe the biggest part) of what I bring to the table.  And I'm ok with that.  I'm going to represent this company to the best of my ability, with pride and with joy.  I'm going to do everything I can to live up to the faith they've shown in me.  Hopefully we'll find some good stories to tell, and hopefully you'll join us for a fun ride.

As Max said when leaving Montrail for Salomon early last year, there are always mixed feelings when making a change of teams or sponsors.  You feel loyalty to those who have backed you in the past.  You don't want to feel like a "sellout".  You've made relationships that you are leaving behind.  These are never easy decisions.  But this one was made much easier for me because there is no other shoe company I want to run for.  Right now, I feel like I'm back home.



Inov-8 isn't my only sponsor.  I'm lucky to have support from a number of fantastic companies, including Mountain Peak FitnessRed Newt Racing (and, through the MPF/RNR team, GUUD, and Merrell), Orange Mud, and Yard Owl.  Check out my new and improved Sponsors page and please patronize these fine companies (in a non-patronizing way of course).

Race Report: Canyon Meadow 50K--Riding the Ragged Edge


A couple of months ago, when we started planning a spring break trip to California to visit some family and friends, I did what I usually do and stopped by Ultrasignup, looking for races in the area.  This never really seems to work for me--I will rarely find a race that matches up with my travel plans--but to my surprise one popped up.  The Canyon Meadow Trail Races, in Redwood Regional Park in Oakland, would be held the day after we arrived in San Francisco, a mere 30 miles from where we were staying the night before.  Jodi took a bit of convincing; I had to make the argument that if I raced a 50K on the first day of our trip, I'd be comfortable taking the rest of the week off.  Logistically there were some problems with cars and rides and such.  But I was able to make it work and found myself at the start Sunday morning among a small ultra field mixed in with competitors running the 5-mile, half-marathon, 30K, and marathon options as well.

I'm not sure why it felt so important for me to run this race.  Certainly in the grand scheme of things it didn't matter much.  (I guess none of it does, really.)  I hadn't been targeting the race at all; it was very much a last-minute idea, or as last-minute as I get with this sort of thing.  I like running and racing in new places, which was part of it.  The timing worked out well with my vacation, and I was able to rationalize taking a dietary break for the week afterwards.  (It can be hard to stick with the diet on vacation.)  But mostly I think I was just excited to be in a race that I had a chance to win.  I've had what I consider a strong start to the year at Bandera and Caumsett, and a good six-month stretch reaching back to Water Gap.  But I didn't go into any of those races thinking I had any chance at a victory.  Sometimes it's just fun to try and run up at the front of a race, and I think I just really wanted that opportunity.

I knew going in, though, that I wasn't at my best.  As successful as 2016 has been thus far, it's come with a bit of a price.  Two high-level ultra efforts in eight weeks had taken their toll, particularly Caumsett, where the stress of pounding pavement at a high intensity for three and a half hours had left my legs trashed.  Laura was running the day after Caumsett, but even ten days later I wasn't feeling right, and though my soreness was gone by the time we got to California, I reached the starting line still without having had a run since then with any pep in the legs.  I knew I'd be in contention, but in terms of performance, I really didn't know what my body could offer.

I started off in the lead group of runners attacking the first climb, which comprises the first mile or so of the race and gains about 400' elevation.  I ran the majority of the climb at a very easy pace, walking only a few spots here and there.  It was a little tough to tell exactly who was in which race.  Our bib numbers identified which race we were running, but with bibs on the front, I wasn't sure who among the 10-12 people in front of me was in the 50K or the shorter distances.  I was pretty sure I was leading the 50K, based mostly on what I perceived of everyone's effort around me and the fact that nobody seemed to be carrying a bottle or pack as I might expect for a trail 50K.  (Though I wasn't carrying anything either, at least not on the first lap, so who knew how reliable that was.)  After the first couple of miles, the path leveled off, and I fell into an easy rhythm with a half-marathoner.  I decided not to worry about where I stood in the field.  I could only take what my body would give me on this day.  If it was enough to compete up front, great; I'd figure that out soon enough.  But early on I had to run my own race.  I ran as easily as I could manage, just trying to cover ground with minimal effort, enjoy the surroundings, and see where the chips fell.

The miles passed easily enough.  We reached the first aid station at 4.7 miles in just over 39 minutes, taking a quick drink and moving on.  Most of the climbing for the first lap was behind us; the course rolled gently, on a mix of dirt roads and West Coast single track, which is basically doubletrack with a few rocks and roots here and there.  The park was very pretty, though felt like the downtown city park it basically is; we were never terribly far from a road or parking area.  But the redwoods, while not particularly dense, were pretty, and there were a couple of breathtaking views to keep us interested.

I was content to maintain a fairly easy effort level through AS2, at about 10.8 miles, where one of the volunteers confirmed I was leading the 50K.  About a half-mile later we reached the start/finish area, except to complete the loop we ran past the finish line for a two-mile out-and-back paved section, where I was able to see for myself where I stood.  In front of me were all half-marathoners and a single marathoner, the women's leader, about two minutes ahead of me.  I made the turn and started checking my gaps to the next 50K runners: about two minutes to second place, who looked to be struggling; another minute back to third place, looking solid; and then about a 13-minute gap to fourth.  A podium spot seemed assured, but the win was still very much up in the air.  I finished the first lap in 1:43, right in line for my pre-race goal of a 3:30 marathon split, and took in my first calories of the day.  I had planned on grabbing my iPod for lap 2 but decided with only a small gap over second and third I should stay focused and alert, and instead resolved only to grab my Orange Mud handheld.  Unfortunately when I got to my drop bag I realized I had left the water bottle back in the car.  This caused a bit of panic, but I realized there wasn't much I could do now except hydrate at the aid stations and hope for the best, and I headed out for lap 2.

The second lap proved fairly uneventful.  I was running solo, except on the rare occasions when I'd lap a slower marathoner.  But I was almost never alone.  The park had filled up with all manner of hikers and joggers, all of whom seemed to have dogs, all of which seemed to be off-leash; I spent a great deal of time dodging curious puppies whose oblivious owners had stopped dead in the middle of the trail for a chat with someone they knew.  I tried to keep the miles effortless, but this was becoming nearly impossible; though the terrain was not overly difficult, I was finally feeling the full effects of the past few months.  Joe had warned me, in the lead-up to Bandera, that by trying to stretch my peak out to Caumsett, I was "riding the ragged edge of fitness."  I reflected now that by chasing this win I was really pushing my luck.  I didn't fear getting injured, but past the twenty-mile mark I knew I was both physically and mentally going to the well.  It wasn't particularly uncomfortable.  I just knew that there really wasn't any reserve left.

My pace had slowed significantly, closer to 8:30s now, but I saw approaching the turnaround that I had even pulled back a minute or so to the marathon leader (Anna Zielaski, who set a very strong womens' CR of 3:32 and won the marathon by nearly 30 minutes).  After making the turn and seeing that my lead was growing, I started to relax.  Second place was now about 12 minutes back, and I knew that as long as I simply kept moving forward, I was likely to hang on.

The final five mile stretch was an out-and-back over the first section of the main loop, which meant running the opening climb for the third time.  Though by this point "running" was a stretch; I simply hiked most of the climb and jogged the flat sections on top.  It was quite a slog.  Surprisingly, in the closing miles, my legs (despite feeling like Jell-O) were not the worst part of me; I had almost no strength in my core.  Particularly on the downhills, I felt incredibly fatigued in my back, glutes, and abs, to the point that I was favoring my entire core on the way down.  I was surprised because I've been very diligent over the past six months in adhering to my core regimen.  This regimen clearly needs a bit of a boost, and I'll be consulting with Joe and Elizabeth when we return to New York to do some fine-tuning in that respect.

Otherwise the closing stages were an nondescript slog.  I jogged home for the win in an unremarkable 4:22.  I had few goals for the day otherwise, so I guess we can chalk that one up in the "win" column, so to speak.  At least I felt as though I'd earned my dietary vacation.  My pilgrimage to the Russian River and Bear Republic breweries later in the week were gloriously guilt-free.  Much thanks to Wendell, Leng, and the rest of the crew at Coastal Trail Runs for a really first-class event.  And love to the sponsors as always.

Gear Review: Ultimate Direction Fastpack 20


I’ve run with a variety of different hydration systems, from handhelds to waistbelts to vests and packs.  When it comes to hydration, I tend to be a minimalist; particularly in training, I rarely carry much of anything, except on the longest efforts.  But for long training runs of 25+ miles, or unsupported or minimally-supported races, I’ve had good results with both the Ultimate Direction AK vest and the Orange Mud HydraQuiver.  Neither of these have enough storage for a long day hike, though.  Recently, on a family hike through Black Creek Preserve in Esopus, I was able to test out the Ultimate Direction Fastpack 20.

The Fastpack 20 is a day hiking pack that is inspired by UD's Signature Series of running vests (the AK/SJ/PB vests that are widely seen on the ultra running circuit). As with all the vests in that series, the water bottles are located in front, on each shoulder strap, which makes for easy access and excellent stability. Also with the vests, the shoulder straps are secured by two adjustable sternum straps, which I prefer when hiking (though they can sometimes annoy me when running). The shoulder straps are nicely padded and quite comfortable, though I did find the ride a little low on my back.

The pack itself is basically one big pocket with about 20 liters of storage (hence the "Fastpack 20" moniker). There are mesh pockets on either side which are fairly spacious for additional items, as well as built-in lashes for trekking poles, which is very useful. One cool feature is that the main compartment has no zippered closure or flap over the top; basically, the upper part of the compartment rolls over on itself and secures to the sides with clips. I'm not sure why I liked this so much, but I found it extremely cool. I think I just like the fact that there are so few extraneous/moving parts. You can really cinch the pack down if you're traveling light; it compresses to about 15 liters if you want. This top rollover compartment is waterproof, and the rest of the pack is water-resistant.

Much like the Signature Series of vests, the Fastpack is very streamlined; it's large enough for everything you would need for a long day on the trails, but not so large as to be cumbersome or to invite over-packing. Having the water bottles on the shoulder straps can take a little getting used to if you're not familiar with it, but having run in UD products before, I appreciate the convenience of easy access to water. The fit of the back panel is a change from the vests, and on first wearing was not as flexible as I'd like, but I suspect that will improve as the pack breaks in a little bit. All in all, the Fastpack is an excellent choice for day hikes or even a weekend if you're traveling light.

Race Report: Caumsett 50K--"Too Short?"


I first ran the Caumsett 50K in March of 2008, my third ultramarathon and my first national championship.  The race, hosted by the Greater Long Island Running Club at Caumsett State Park in Lloyd Harbor, NY, has served as the US 50K road championships since 2006.  I ran much of the race with Dan Verrington and Leigh Schmidt, two studs from New England, ultimately falling off their pace but running a (still-standing) PR of 3:25, finishing seventh overall.  (Dan's 3:17 that day was, at the time, a national age-group record.)  It was about five minutes slower than I thought I might do, but I had felt like I had put in a very good effort and all in all was pretty pleased with how it turned out, nabbing a top-10 in a national championship race.  Of course, when I called Joe Puleo to tell him how it had gone, his immediate response was, "What happened?  Too short?"

My immediate response (other than "fuck you, asshole," which I'm 75% sure I didn't say) was"Oh, god, no!"  I was just scratching the surface of ultras at that time, and still had at least one foot in the marathon world; my marathon PR had come just 18 months earlier, and only six months before I had been in likely low-to-mid 2:30s shape leading into Chicago only to be foiled by an epically hot day.  I still had the mindset that anything longer than a marathon was an incredible undertaking, and had not yet come to the realization that 31 miles miles really isn't that much farther than 26.2.  The thought of going beyond that point seemed unimaginable at the time.

Fast forward eight years.  Training for my first 100K this winter brought with it a certain measure of anxiety and self-doubt.  Finishing was not my concern; I wondered, though, whether I really was built for the longer stuff.  In the last eight years, I've grown very comfortable with the 50K distance, and had several strong performances at the 40-mile Mount Mitchell Challenge.  But I had yet to experience any real success at 50 miles; certainly nothing commensurate with my performances in shorter ultras and trail races.  I'd been unable to completely master the nutritional requirements or to fight through the fatigue in the late stages.  So despite my long-standing (ill-considered?) belief that I get stronger as the races get longer, I was apprehensive that the 100K might not suit me all that well.  As Bandera approached and my fitness progressed, I started to think that maybe I should take another crack at Caumsett.  It was a known quantity at a distance where I'd experienced some success; a good fallback or safety valve if the 100K proved to be too much for me.  My workouts were not far off of what I'd been able to do back in 2008.  At 40 years old, could I run close to--or better than--that 3:25 I'd thought was beyond my reaching again?

As it has much of this winter, the weather cooperated nicely: clear and cool, high 30s at the start, low to mid-40s by midday, no significant wind.  I lined up in the third row with Laura and Joe Murphy, behind the likely favorites, including Zach Ornelas, who last year had set the course record of 2:52; Jared Burdick, second at the 2015 Cayuga Trails; 2:20 marathoner Fred Joslyn; and my teammate Cole.  My goal was to run even splits, even slightly negative if things went well, and try to stay near the front of the masters field, but ultimately to run my own race.  Zach took off at the gun, opening up a 15-second gap on the field by the mile mark; I ran in the lead masters' pack, in about 12th place, with three or four other old guys until we hit the mile in 6:10.  I felt pretty relaxed but knew this was not sustainable, and quickly eased off the gas and let the pack go.  I was running solo almost immediately, but was able to find my rhythm quickly and ran 6:30 for the second mile, just a few seconds ahead of what I wanted.  I settled in for the day.

photo: Ed Grenzig

The course is a 5K "loop" with a short out-and back section just before the start/finish, repeated ten times.  With a couple hundred runners soon joined by a few hundred 25K runners (starting five minutes later) on a short loop, the road quickly became congested.  Even so, I ran solo--as alone as you can be when surrounded by other people--the rest of the way.  I was passing and lapping people throughout, but outside of the first mile, I spent almost no time with anyone running the same pace as I was.

The race had split up into a few groups.  Zach was off the front, chasing the American record of 2:47.  Jared and Fred led one chase pack; Cole and Eric Senseman another.  Then came the masters group of three or four runners.  Then four or five solo runners stretched out over a few minutes' gap, including Dan Verrington, still getting it done at 53, and Caroline Boller, the women's leader.  Behind me lurked a few runners, including Joe and Laura, who was running very fast, though she looked pretty uncomfortable.  (She struggled through the day with some hip pain--us trail runners don't take too kindly to the roads--but gutted out a fantastic 3:40 to place second.  She is so, so tough.)

I struggled a bit getting comfortable in the early stages--I was running very even 6:30-6:35 splits, but my legs felt a little heavy and tight--but past 15K I started to feel great.  The 6:30s started to feel too easy, and I had to rein myself in to prevent them from turning into 6:20s.  Lap 4 was my fastest and easiest of the day, and lap five passed quite comfortably as well; I came through halfway in 1:41:06, in 15th place I believe, feeling very strong and confident that a 3:25 was well within reach.  My plan now called for me to relax through laps 6 and 7 as much as possible while making a concerted effort to take in some fluid and calories.  Through 25K I had taken in just a little bit of water and no calories, so starting lap 6 I grabbed my handheld and resolved to take in at least two gels, four S! caps, and the entire bottle by the end of lap 7.  I was well on pace and was OK with giving back a little time here.  Even if I gave back 30 seconds per lap over the next two, I was looking at a 41:30-42:00 10K and a 35K split of 2:23.  I was then fairly certain I could run a 62-minute last 15K for my 3:25.
photo: Ed Grenzig
Lap six passed without much incident--I was getting a little tight, but nothing unmanageable--but it was becoming clear that I had a bathroom issue.  From about the hour mark on, I had an inkling that I had to pee.  Normally, in an ultra, I'd just stop and go, but a flat road 50K, like a marathon run for time, is unforgiving; afraid to stop and lose precious seconds, by lap 5 I was starting to psych myself up to just pee on myself as I ran.  (What a stupid sport this is.)  Which would have been fine, but midway through lap six my stomach was starting to make it known that my pre-race evacuation, while satisfying at the time, had been inadequate.  I tried hoping it would go away, but that didn't work, and I really didn't have any other ideas, so I pulled over at the mid-lap aid station halfway through the seventh lap--almost exactly the 20-mile mark, in 2:11.

In a trail race, or a longer ultra, this would be no big deal.  A road 50K, though, has much more in common with a marathon than with what we usually think of in ultras.  One of the reasons I got out of marathoning (other than not being very good at it) was that the enormity of the effort coupled with the relentlessness of the clock was too overwhelming.  There is just no room for error.  Running a big-city marathon like Chicago or New York renders your place basically meaningless; I couldn't tell you if I had a good raced based on finishing 150th, or 500th.  Only the time matters.  To put so much effort into training only to be derailed by something as trivial as the weather, or the course, or, having to stop and poop--it's just too frustrating.  And I was acutely aware of that feeling as I opened the port-a-potty door and thought, "Oh, well, my race is over."

I gave up two and a half minutes in the stall--150 agonizing seconds--and it took me another 1-2 minutes of slow jogging afterwards to shake the stiffness out of the legs.  By the end of the seventh lap I felt like I had my rhythm back.  I tossed my bottle and got back to work.  The PR was gone, but sub-3:30 was still in play.

photo: Ed Grenzig
Lap eight passed quickly; I felt very strong and was able to earn back one or two of the spots I'd lost during my pit stop.  By the start of lap 9, I was tightening up again; the pace had slipped from 6:35-6:40 down to 6:50-6:55, but I was holding it together.  I split the marathon in 2:56:05 (pre-race goal had been around 2:50-2:51, so without my bathroom break, a 2:53 or so--not too far off) and caught Joe, struggling with hamstring tightness, a quarter mile later.  I started the bell lap knowing I'd need close to a sub-21:00 5K to break 3:30.  I couldn't quite make that happen, but by the mile mark I started seeing glimpses of Dan Verrington about a minute ahead.  I'd been chasing him for nearly three hours, and thought I was likely to run out of room, but I gave chase anyway.  For awhile nothing happened, but by the two-mile mark of the loop I had the gap down to about 30-40 seconds, and it looked like he was coming back to me.  I still doubted I had enough time, but kept pushing, and it paid off, as I was able to draw alongside with about a half mile to go and put in a nice hard pass to secure the spot by about 20 seconds at the finish.

SplitIntervalCumulative
5K19:5919:59
10K20:2240:21
15K20:171:00:37
20K20:091:20:46
25K20:191:41:06
30K20:482:01:54
35K23:512:25:46
40K21:042:46:51
45K21:493:08:40
50K21:453:30:25

In all, it was a good B+/A- effort.  I hadn't quite been able to pull out the PR--even without the pit stop, I might have fallen short--but subtracting three minutes from my seventh lap gives a 3:27, which I would have been quite happy with.  I'm beat up like I haven't been for awhile; I almost forgot how tough road marathons are, and I'll be on the bike only for the next couple of days.  But this was my second top-3 age group placing at a national championship this year, and I'll certainly take that.  It was tough, though, returning to straight time-based road racing for the first time in a number of years, and I think that my answer nowadays to Joe's question might be: "Yeah.  Too short."

Race Report: Bandera 100K--Suggestibility and the Curse of the Elite


"A trail of rugged & brutal beauty where everything cuts, stings, or bites."
--Tejas Trails race website

I've proven in the past to be a bit of the suggestible type.  Particularly where racing is concerned.  And as more and more races start to look enticing, I've found it harder and harder to say no.  A few years ago, even with several 50 milers under my belt, I had no real desire to tackle the 100-mile distance.  Yet within the last eighteen months, as I've immersed myself deeper into the ultra world, I've become fixated (like everyone else, it seems) on getting to the starting line in Squaw Valley.  And while most rational people think this is as stupid as it probably is, I've been spending more time training with less rational people.  Which is probably why it seemed like I had to get my WS lottery qualifier immediately.  And why when Phil told me he was registering for Bandera last fall, the only decision I had to make was whether I was going to join him there or wait a month to run Rocky Raccoon.

Ultimately a 100K seemed like a better idea than jumping straight to a 100 mile.  We started ramping up the training just after the Water Gap 50K in October; I'll go into a little more detail in a bit, but suffice to say it went quite well.  So well, in fact, that I found myself enjoying some of the best fitness I'd ever had.  I ran my high school alumni XC race in November for the twenty-third straight year (god, I can't believe it's been that long) and turned in my best performance there in a decade, despite the highest mileage I'd run since medical school.  I journeyed out to Texas with Phil and our friend Kali, feeling quietly confident.  I had two terrible runs in the days leading up to the race--tapering is the worst--but reminded myself of the last few workouts I'd put in, including a (short) ten-mile progression run in under 63 minutes, and a 20-mile long run eight days before the race that I'd run in 2:21 while holding back the entire way.  I came up with five tiers of goals for the race, ranging from easily attainable to frankly unrealistic:

"D" goal: finish my first 100K, qualify for the WS lottery
"C" goal: break 11 hours
"B" goal: break 10 hours, finish in the top 10-15, top 5 masters
"A" goal: sub-9:30, finish in the top 5 if I got lucky, top 3 masters
Ridiculously unrealistic goal: sub-9:00, Golden Ticket to WS 2016

The last one wasn't even really a goal; it would require me basically running out of my head for nine hours without any consequences and would also require a lot of folks in an elite field not having particularly good days.  None of which seemed to be in my control.

We lined up for the start on a clear, cool morning among a national-class field that included four men from the GUR top 50.  For a sub-elite runner such as myself, running against a field that is out of my league can make things a little easier; it frees me up from having to think about racing for places, especially early in the race, and allows me to focus on running my own pace and sticking with a race strategy.  That strategy was to run the first lap with as little effort as possible--really, the first 40 miles, if I could manage to be patient enough.

Bandera trail, where everything cuts and stings.
photo: Kali Bird

The Bandera course starts with the toughest running in the first five miles, which played into my strategy perfectly, making it very easy to back off, walking the big climbs, running the downhills as relaxed as possible.  I ran the opening mile at the back of the lead pack of twenty or so, letting them go without a fight pretty quickly and falling in after about a mile with Chad Lasater, another runner in my age group.  Chad is a native Oklahoman who currently lives in Dubai, and has had alot of interesting running experiences at many of the classic trail races throughout Europe, so the early miles passed quickly as we fell into a nice rhythm.  I led most of the way with Chad just behind; we passed through AS1, about 9K in, right around 9:00/mile pace.

From AS1 through AS3 was about 11 miles of basically flat, runnable trail, with some small steady climbs.  The millions of rocks that litter the Bandera course were a bit less dense in these sections, and it was easy to find a nice rhythm running between 8:00-8:30 pace.  I was careful to keep the effort in check, reminding myself to slow down every time I felt my breathing get even a little heavy or my legs take on a little fatigue.  Despite the relative ease of effort, though, we were making good progress, and caught two or three runners before we reached AS3.  Chad stopped at this point to restock his supplies from his drop bag, while I continued on, using my Orange Mud handheld and taking in about a GU an hour.  By now we had caught up with many of the 25K runners and I made my way through the back end of that field, still keeping the effort level in check, coming through 11 miles in 1:33, 16.9 miles in 2:21, and 21.8 miles in 3:05.   The four-mile section from AS4 to AS5 was almost completely runnable save for one giant climb and descent at the end; I ran that in a very relaxed 35 minutes and passed AS5 (26 miles) at 3:40, still feeling very smooth.  The last 5 miles of the loop mirrored the first five, with several large climbs and descents over the rockiest sections of the course, but I kept up a relaxed tempo and focused on walking the uphills efficiently and descending with minimal effort; I passed two more runners before I reached halfway in 4:26.  On the short out-and-back section leading in and out of the start/finish area, I counted about five runners, including women's leaders Cassie Scallon and Michelle Yates, within six or seven minutes in front of me.  Trying to read facial expressions is tough, but I convinced myself that I felt better than they all looked (with the exception of Cassie, who looked locked in), and after a brief 2-minute stop to refill my bottle, pound some Coke, and eat a slice of bacon (my first stop in an aid station on the day), I headed back out for loop 2 eager to make up some ground.

Judging from splits in previous years, most runners, even the leaders, demonstrated a significant slowdown on lap two, as the climbs and rocks started to extract their toll.  I knew that losing even two minutes per mile might not cost me any spots, and that if I could limit the damage to less than that, there might be a few people I could pick off.  And I felt good; tired, but I clearly hadn't overextended myself early.  Sub-9 was not going to happen, but I felt quite confident I could run a 5:30 second lap and come in under 10 hours.  I forced myself to stay patient, particularly early in the loop, and made my way cautiously through the first 5+ miles to AS7.  The split here was just under 1 minute/mile slower than on lap one, and I caught two runners, including Michelle.  I was assuming at this point that I was around 15th place, but the folks at the aid station thought I might be in the top 10.  I told myself they were crazy and pressed on.

Miles 36-42 were very runnable, but I tried to still keep the effort under control.  I was starting to fatigue a little bit, but by pushing the salt tablets and taking an extra gel, I kept that at bay.  I wanted to have as much left as possible for the final twenty miles, when I'd be entering unchartered territory for me, having never gone past 50 miles before.  Even so, I managed one more pass before reaching AS8, 42 miles in 6:11 (about 1:44 for the second loop, almost exactly 1 minute/mile slower than lap 1).  Stopped at the aid station was Kory Cool, a young elite from Kansas with a 3:05 50K to his credit.  He looked like he was getting ready to drop, but confirmed I was up to eighth place overall.

The next stretch to AS9 continued to be very runnable, and finally I felt comfortable letting myself get a little more aggressive.  I knew the section between AS9-10 would require a good bit of hiking and would allow myself a bit of time to recover, so I opened up a little bit; the 5.9 miles which had taken me 48 minutes the first time through took me about 54 minutes this time (again, keeping it right at 1 minute/mile difference), and I caught another runner leaving AS9 on a flat stretch leading up to the biggest climb of that section.  Somewhere in that stretch I passed the 50-mile mark in around 7:24, making this not only my longest run ever but also setting a 50-mile PR by over 5 minutes.

AS9 and 10 are the same spot, and as I stopped at AS10 to grab my headlamp for the final stretch, Phil was in AS9, looking pretty good.  We chatted very briefly before I struck out again for the final 9-mile push.  Once I found my rhythm I let loose; the next four miles were the last runnable four miles on the course; there was nothing left to save in the tank now.  And somehow I still felt great.  Tired, but strong; I mowed down the miles to AS11 in 37 minutes, reaching the 57-mile mark in 8:34 and knowing that sub-9:30 was in reach.  The last five miles were a bit of a slog--once I passed the 9:00 mark, I was really ready to be done--but I kept up a 10:00/mile pace, finishing lap 2 in 4:57 (again, almost exactly 1 minute/mile slower than lap 1) for a sixth-place finish (fifth male, second master) in 9:23.
A very happy, very blurry Phil, who had a great race to finish in 10:38.
This is the only picture I took all weekend.
I'm by no means an elite runner, but this was an elite result, against a very strong field.  How did that happen?  I'd attribute this to a few factors:

Training.  I've been fortunate enough to have had nearly 18 months of virtually uninterrupted training, with my only injury of significance in the past year being the freak back injury I had in July while tripping in the ocean.  I ran 4317 miles in 2015, second-most in my career.  Over the final ten weeks of the year, before my two-week taper, I ran nearly 1000 miles, recovery weeks included.  But beyond just the mileage was the amount of quality work I was able to put in: track intervals ranging from 400m repeats to ladders and miles; a couple of tempo sessions; four marathon-pace runs; and several long runs in the 33-40 mile range.  In terms of depth and breadth, it was the best sustained training block I'd had in years.  I supplemented that with some very light core work: just a short routine that takes 10-15 minutes of pushups, sit-ups, planks, side crunches, and various stretches, which I try to do at least five days a week.  Regular short sessions on the foam roller--generally daily, if I could remember--were instrumental in recovering between workouts and keeping me injury-free.

Diet.  I don't want to harp on this, and I don't want to give this too much credit.  As I've stated before, the science on LCHF is inconclusive at best.  And I don't want to proselytize--nothing is worse than having someone tell you what you should or shouldn't be eating.  Anecdotally, though, for me, I've certainly seen significant benefits from whatever bastardized version of LCHF/OFM I've been adhering to for most of the past year.  Much of this is likely due to just simple weight control; but I've found the benefit in energy level and expenditure during long efforts to be profound.  I ran 9+ hours at 9:00/mile pace without a hint of a bonk and without any GI issues.  My intake for the entire race consisted of somewhere between 6-8 GUs, half a banana, half a PBJ, a couple of M&Ms, and two strips of bacon. (I used GU Brew for fluids--probably filling my 16-oz bottle four or five times--and pounded Coke at every aid station in loop 2.)  It's not the reason things went well, but it certainly helped.

Strategy.  There's something to be said for having a plan and sticking to it, and forcing myself to hold back over the first 35-40 miles proved to be a winning plan for me.  I'm constantly learning how to run ultras better, and I've found--surprise!--that running within myself in the early stages has lead to the most success for me; almost every bad race I've had in the past several years can be tied to going out too hard.  As I mentioned earlier, this can be a lot easier when you're in a sub-elite or recreational position, rather than being an elite athlete who has to concern themselves not only with their own tactics but with those of everyone else around them.  As it turned out, I wasn't far off of grabbing a Golden Ticket, but pre-race that was a pipe dream.  If I'd started the race as a serious contender for a podium spot, would I have been able to lay back early and let the leaders build a 30 minute lead over the first 50K?  Patience is a lot easier when you don't have anything on the line.  The Curse of the Elite is that the margin for error is much smaller; they have to take risks the rest of us don't.  Last weekend, for Chris Dennucci and Jim Walmsley, it worked out.  For Kory Cool and Mario Mendoza, it didn't.  Not having to concern myself early on with what they were doing allowed me to pick up some of the pieces later on when things went sideways.  It lowers the potential variability--you won't win with that strategy, but it might give you the best odds of maximizing your individual performance.

All in all this was a great start to 2016 and a great introduction to the world of longer races, which I may have developed an appetite for.  The good folks at Tejas Trails put on a fantastic event, and I look forward to returning to Texas next year for Rocky Raccoon (don't tell my wife).  Next up are two more national championships: road 50K at Caumsett Park in March, then trail 50 mile at Cayuga in June.  The second half of the year is still up in the air, but may include some longer stuff as well.  For now, I'm enjoying a few days of carbs and beer, and a few weeks of being just an ultra fan before I start buckling down again.

Quick gear recap: MPF/RNR racing kit from Patagonia; compression socks from SLS3; Orange Mud trucker cap (and lightweight OM/Headsweats cap that I grabbed for lap 2, when it got a little warmer) and handheld; inov-8 Roclite 280 shoes; GU Roctane and GU Brew.

Gear Review: Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts

I tend to be pretty picky about my running shorts, more so than most of my other gear.  I run in shorts down to about 25 degrees outside, so I spend a good bit of the year in shorts.  I don't like my shorts too long or too short; I like a certain cut.  I need them to be lightweight but stable, and I need to be able to carry a few essentials without feeling like the shorts are slipping down my bottom.

I've found a lot to like with the Patagonia Strider Pro shorts.  Before joining the MPF/RNR team last year,  I did many of my long runs and most of my ultras in the Pearl Izumi Fly Endurance short.  These have a lycra-type material that comprises the upper half of the back part of the shorts, where the gel pockets are located; this helps keep everything stable.  The Patagonia Strider Pro shorts have a similar design; while the material is not quite as tight as lycra, the upper half of the rear of the short is made of a stretchier material that the rest of the short, which stabilizes the rear pockets.  This is by far the best feature of the shorts, allowing you to carry gels, keys, or other essentials without the constant bouncing that would otherwise drive you crazy.  Lots of shorts have multiple rear pockets nowadays; what separates a good short from a bad one is whether or not you can actually use those pockets without bouncing or slipping.  These shorts accomplish that goal, which is the most essential part of making a good ultra short.


There are five pockets in the back.  Four interlocking pockets have an "envelope" design, with elastic flaps that hold gear in place; they will each hold about two gels comfortably.  The middle, largest pocket features a zippered closure and is large enough for keys, a phone, credit cards, or other essentials.

The material is lightweight and breathable, and due to the DWR treatment, repels sweat well without getting too heavy.  The liner is comfortable and doesn't chafe.  The shorts have a split cut on the side of the leg, which for me is an absolute essential; I refuse to run in notched basketball-style shorts.  The only downside for me is the 5" inseam, which is about an inch longer than I'd prefer (gotta show off the quads!).  Plus I'd like the split on the side to be a little higher, giving it a bit of a less "boxy" cut.  But that's nitpicking.  All in all, the Patagonia Strider Pro shorts provide excellent form and function for long training and ultra racing, and I'm happy to have Patagonia on board as a MPF/RNR team sponsor.

Revised 2015 Final Ultra National Rankings

So 2015 is in the books, and I've finished updating the Ultra National Rankings for the year.  Only one change to the top 50 in the final two weeks of racing: Ed Ettinghausen jumped into 36th on the men's side, following up his third place showing at the Desert Solstice 24-hour with a win at the Across the Years 6 Day only a week later.  Unbelievable stuff.

The Ultrarunning UROY results were released as well, so we can see how the voters' top 10 compared to the rankings:

Men
UROY
GR Ranking
Women
UROY
GR Ranking
David Laney
1
6
Magdalena Boulet
1
1
Ian Sharman
2
7
Camille Herron
2
4
Seth Swanson
3
9
Stephanie Howe
3
3
Rob Krar
4
2
Kaci Lickteig
4
5
Dylan Bowman
5
3
Katalin Nagy
5
10
Zach Miller
6
11
Nicole Studer
6
7
Brian Rusiecki
7
1
Aliza Lapierre
7
8
Alex Nichols
8
10
Ellie Greenwood
8
9
Joe Fejes
9
59
Darcy Piceu
9
26
Bob Shebest
10
12
Bethany Patterson
10
18

I've already started working on the rankings for 2016, with a few minor tweaks as I outlined earlier.  Some exciting news: I'm working with the good folks at Ultrarunning magazine to try to bring these rankings to a wider audience.  In the coming weeks, we hope to have a dedicated page on the UR website for these rankings (which I think I'm going to rename the Gunksrunner Ultra Rankings, you know, building the brand and all).

As always, peruse the entire list here.  (Helpful hint from some smart folks: use CTRL-F to search for your name on the sheet.)

Final 2015 Top 50


Men
State
Points
Women
State
Points
1
Brian Rusiecki
MA
104.15
Magdalena Boulet
CA
171.6
2
Rob Krar
AZ
87.5
Kathleen Cusick
VA
105.5
3
Dylan Bowman
CA
80.5
Stephanie Howe
OR
95.075
4
Paul Terranova
TX
79.9
Camille Herron
OK
90
5
Alex Varner
CA
78.6
Kaci Lickteig
NE
87.275
6
David Laney
OR
72.2
Larissa Dannis
CA
82.4
7
Ian Sharman
CA
69.5
Nicole Studer
TX
79.675
8
Ryan Bak
OR
68.9
Aliza Lapierre
VT
78.6
9
Seth Swanson
MT
68.6
Ellie Greenwood
Can
78.15
10
Alex Nichols
CO
62.8
Katalin Nagy
FL
72.5
11
Zach Miller
CO
62.5
Cassie Scallon
CO
71.8
12
Bob Shebest
CA
56.375
Ashley Erba
CO
70.9
13
Justin Houck
WA
56.075
Sarah Bard
MA
64.225
14
Zach Bitter
WI
52.5
Bev Anderson-Abbs
CA
58.6
15
Jared Hazen
CO
52
Megan Kimmel
CO
55
16
Mark Hammond
UT
51.8
Amy Rusiecki
MA
55
17
Ryan Kaiser
OR
50.975
Neela D’Souza
Can
54.5
18
Jim Walmsley
AZ
50.3
Bethany Patterson
WA
52
19
Ryan Smith
CO
50.075
Hillary Allen
CO
51.375
20
Chikara Omine
CA
50
Kerrie Bruxvoort
CO
49.4
21
Jorge Maravilla
CA
49.8
Rachel Ragona
CA
49.15
22
Jorge Pacheco
CA
49.3
Traci Falbo
IN
48.1
23
Mario Martinez
CA
48.4
Jacqueline Palmer
NE
48
24
Jean Pommier
CA
47
Emily Richards
NC
46.6
25
Mario Mendoza
OR
47
Emma Roca
ESP
46.35
26
Christopher Dennucci
CA
46.7
Darcy Piceu
CO
43.175
27
Benjamin Stern
CA
46.2
Caroline Boller
CA
41.95
28
Andrew Miller
OR
46
Ashley Nordell
OR
41
29
Pete Kostelnick
NE
46
Lee Conner
OH
40.5
30
Gediminus Grinius
LTH
44
Amanda Basham
OR
39.15
31
David Herr
VT
43
Angela Shartel
CA
39
32
Daven Oskvig
NY
42.5
Amy Phillips
CA
38
33
Michael Wardian
VA
41.1
Emily Peterson
CA
37.75
34
Daniel Hamilton
TN
41
Silke Koester
CO
37.4
35
Scott Traer
MA
40
Kara Henry
CO
37
36
Ed Ettinghausen
CA
38.85
Catrin Jones
Can
36.8
37
Ryan Ghelfi
OR
37.175
Erika Lindland
CA
36.475
38
Dominic Layfield
UT
37
Robin Watkins
DC
36.1
39
Michael Borst
WI
37
Megan Stegemiller
VA
36
40
Daniel Kraft
OR
36.025
Susan Barrows
OR
35
41
Nate Jacqua
OR
36
Luanne Park
CA
34.525
42
Chris Vizcaino
CA
35.7
Maggie Guterl
PA
34.4
43
Mike Foote
MT
35
Alissa St. Laurent
Can
34
44
Ray Sanchez
CA
35
Julie Koepke
TX
34
45
Sage Canaday
CO
34.5
Leslie Semler
MA
33.1
46
Joshua Arthur
CO
34.325
Marylou Corino
Can
33
47
Owen Bradley
AL
34
Keely Henninger
CO
32.95
48
Michael Carson
AZ
33.5
Ashley Lister
PA
32.8
49
Yassine Diboun
OR
33.5
Leslie Howlett
UT
32.5
50
Jason Lantz
PA
32.85
Meghan Arbogast
CA
32.075

Ultra running National Rankings: Final 2015 Rankings


As 2015 winds down, I'm putting the finishing touches on the national rankings for the year.  There are a handful of races left on the schedule, but the top of the rankings should be pretty much settled.  How did we do?

Not to pat myself on the back too much, but I think we did pretty well.  At the top of the rankings at least, I feel like the system did a really good job of delineating who really had great years.  You can quibble with some of the details (and I'm sure you will); whether you think someone running 10-15 smaller races should rate as highly as someone running only three of four bigger races is, to some degree, a matter of opinion.  But if you peruse the results you'll find that both strategies paid off in 2015.  Brian Rusiecki, Kathleen Cusick, Paul Terranova, and Nicole Studer put up numerous top finishes in a variety of events; Rob Krar, Ellie Greenwood, Zach Miller, and Camille Herron rode just a few dominant performances to high rankings.  Aliza Lapierre, Dylan Bowman, Kaci Lickteig, and David Laney blended the two.  I think the fact that no single strategy dominated the rankings showed that the system is able to account for both depth and breadth of performances, which I thought was going to be one of the biggest challenges going in.

All in all I think the system performed very well.  I was fortunate to get a vote for UROY this year and spent several days last week filling out my ballot.  (It was exciting, and an honor, but very, very difficult.)  I've said all along that I wanted the rankings to be an objective supplement to the subjective voting process, and I think that goal was met.  I'm not sure how much use it is as a voting criteria--I didn't use the exact rankings when deciding my ballot--but as you can see here, the folks I thought were deserving of UROY votes were almost exclusively very highly ranked by the system.  (I'll leave it to you to decide which is the chicken and which is the egg.)  Below I've listed my UROY ballot; the number after each name in the parenthesis is that runner's final ranking (barring any final-weekend changes).

Jay's ballot: Male UROY
1. David Laney (6)
2. Brian Rusiecki (1)
3. Seth Swanson (9)
4. Dylan Bowman (3)
5. Rob Krar (2)
6. Paul Terranova (4)
7. Ian Sharman (7)
8. Alex Nichols (10)
9. Ryan Bak (8)
10. Zach Miller (11)

Jay's ballot: Female UROY
1. Magdalena Boulet (1)
2. Camille Herron (4)
3. Aliza Lapierre (8)
4. Kaci Lickteig (5)
5. Katalin Nagy (10)
6. Kathleen Cusick (2)
7. Stephanie Howe (3)
8. Nicole Studer (7)
9. Larissa Dannis (6)
10. Ellie Greenwood (9)

(If I'd had another week to submit my UROY ballot, Zach Bitter's new 100-mile American Record from this past weekend would have jumped him into my top 10.)

Another role I envisioned for the rankings was in helping athletes with attracting sponsors.  I mean, Rob and Magdalena certainly don't need the help, but I think someone with less name recognition, like, say, Daven Oskvig, might get some benefit from being able to tell a potential shoe sponsor, "You know, I ranked 32nd in the country this year."  Whether or not that's the case remains to be seen.  Maybe in a couple of years.

There are a few changes coming in 2016.  The point values have been tweaked for high-level races, making them relatively more valuable; this should help to further reward the elites who are mixing it up with the best competition.  Additionally, now that we have a full year of data to work from, the field strength multiplier will be expanded to encompass the top 50 runners for each gender.  This will reflect the quality of the fields much more accurately. I've also enlisted the help of a few well-connected folks within the ultra world to help me rate the races more accurately. They are scattered in different parts of the country, so hopefully we'll have an unbiased view of which are the most important races in our sport.

Anyway, without further ado, here are the top 50 men and women for 2015. You can check the final spreadsheet for the full rankings--all 5800 runners, men and women--here. I've added two additional tabs at the bottom, so that now you can view the list both alphabetically and numerically. So, if you want to find your ranking but don't want to scroll through 3000 names, start by finding your name on the alphabetical sheet. Check your final point score in the far right column. Then, scroll down on the numeric sheet to find that score, and bingo, you'll find your name and ranking.

I hope you enjoyed these rankings as much as I enjoyed compiling them, and I hope you'll come back for more in 2016.

As of 12/21


Men
State
Points
Women
State
Points
1
Brian Rusiecki
MA
104.15
Magdalena Boulet
CA
171.6
2
Rob Krar
AZ
87.5
Kathleen Cusick
VA
105.5
3
Dylan Bowman
CA
80.5
Stephanie Howe
OR
95.075
4
Paul Terranova
TX
79.9
Camille Herron
OK
90
5
Alex Varner
CA
78.6
Kaci Lickteig
NE
87.275
6
David Laney
OR
72.2
Larissa Dannis
CA
82.4
7
Ian Sharman
CA
69.5
Nicole Studer
TX
79.675
8
Ryan Bak
OR
68.9
Aliza Lapierre
VT
78.6
9
Seth Swanson
MT
68.6
Ellie Greenwood
Can
78.15
10
Alex Nichols
CO
62.8
Katalin Nagy
FL
72.5
11
Zach Miller
CO
62.5
Cassie Scallon
CO
71.8
12
Bob Shebest
CA
56.375
Ashley Erba
CO
70.9
13
Justin Houck
WA
56.075
Sarah Bard
MA
64.225
14
Zach Bitter
WI
52.5
Bev Anderson-Abbs
CA
58.6
15
Jared Hazen
CO
52
Megan Kimmel
CO
55
16
Mark Hammond
UT
51.8
Amy Rusiecki
MA
55
17
Ryan Kaiser
OR
50.975
Neela D’Souza
Can
54.5
18
Jim Walmsley
AZ
50.3
Bethany Patterson
WA
52
19
Ryan Smith
CO
50.075
Hillary Allen
CO
51.375
20
Chikara Omine
CA
50
Kerrie Bruxvoort
CO
49.4
21
Jorge Maravilla
CA
49.8
Rachel Ragona
CA
49.15
22
Jorge Pacheco
CA
49.3
Traci Falbo
IN
48.1
23
Mario Martinez
CA
48.4
Jacqueline Palmer
NE
48
24
Jean Pommier
CA
47
Emily Richards
NC
46.6
25
Mario Mendoza
OR
47
Emma Roca
ESP
46.35
26
Christopher Dennucci
CA
46.7
Darcy Piceu
CO
43.175
27
Benjamin Stern
CA
46.2
Caroline Boller
CA
41.95
28
Andrew Miller
OR
46
Ashley Nordell
OR
41
29
Pete Kostelnick
NE
46
Lee Conner
OH
40.5
30
Gediminus Grinius
LTH
44
Amanda Basham
OR
39.15
31
David Herr
VT
43
Angela Shartel
CA
39
32
Daven Oskvig
NY
42.5
Amy Phillips
CA
38
33
Michael Wardian
VA
41.1
Emily Peterson
CA
37.75
34
Daniel Hamilton
TN
41
Silke Koester
CO
37.4
35
Scott Traer
MA
40
Kara Henry
CO
37
36
Ryan Ghelfi
OR
37.175
Catrin Jones
Can
36.8
37
Dominic Layfield
UT
37
Erika Lindland
CA
36.475
38
Michael Borst
WI
37
Robin Watkins
DC
36.1
39
Daniel Kraft
OR
36.025
Megan Stegemiller
VA
36
40
Nate Jacqua
OR
36
Susan Barrows
OR
35
41
Chris Vizcaino
CA
35.7
Luanne Park
CA
34.525
42
Mike Foote
MT
35
Maggie Guterl
PA
34.4
43
Ray Sanchez
CA
35
Alissa St. Laurent
Can
34
44
Sage Canaday
CO
34.5
Julie Koepke
TX
34
45
Joshua Arthur
CO
34.325
Leslie Semler
MA
33.1
46
Owen Bradley
AL
34
Marylou Corino
Can
33
47
Michael Carson
AZ
33.5
Keely Henninger
CO
32.95
48
Yassine Diboun
OR
33.5
Ashley Lister
PA
32.8
49
Jason Lantz
PA
32.85
Leslie Howlett
UT
32.5
50
Eric Senseman
AZ
32.5
Meghan Arbogast
CA
32.075

An Unsolicited Rant Regarding a Few Ounces of Beer


(Editor's note: this may be the first in a series of rants coming in the next few weeks.  I have a few things that I feel like I need to get off my chest that might make it out in blog form.  Sorry in advance.)

I ran my first beer mile of 2015 a few weeks ago at what we're I guess calling the second annual Hudson Valley Beer Mile.  I mentioned the inaugural race very briefly last year; I ran the penalty lap (as I almost always do) and finished last in a four-person field in an embarrassing 16:31.  Clearly I am a much better pizza racer than beer miler.  But something clicked for me this year.  I don't know if it's the low carb diet, the fact that I went in on a semi-full stomach, or the fact that I hadn't had a beer for several weeks prior, but I felt much, much better than I normally do during these shenanigans.  We had a solid field of eleven runners.  Dr. Mike went out hard defending his title from the previous year, but BM virgin Oestrike was right on his heels; the two would reprise the back-and-forth battle they had at the pizza race six months earlier.  I felt like I drank the first one pretty quickly for me but was in tenth place starting the first quarter.  I moved up throughout, though, spending most of the race in the mid-pack before eventually working my way up to a chunder-free third place finish in a huge PR of 8:16.  No, I'm not a good beer miler, but at least I'm no longer embarrassingly bad.

Finishing off a PR performance
Photo: Michele Halstead

Second Annual Hudson Valley Beer Mile
November 1, 2015
* = penalty lap

1. Brian Oestrike 7:17
2. Mike Halstead 7:37
3. Jason Friedman 8:16
4. Bill Shashaty 8:26
5. Ed Stoner 8:40
6. Vinny Sickles 10:18
7. NAME REDACTED 10:46*
8. Myron Baker 11:15
9. Jeff Burns 13:00*
10. Rob Piegari 13:35
11. Bill Pape 13:35

The reason I bring this up, though, is because in case you haven't noticed, the beer mile has suddenly become very trendy.  It seems like it's not just college track runners and assorted idiots doing it anymore.  James Nielsen's May 2014 world record of 4:57--the first sub-5:00 beer mile in history--was a watershed moment for the sport, which suddenly gained mainstream notice for the first time.  Much like Bannister's famed 1954 run at Iffley Road (almost 60 years to the day before Nielsen's barrier-breaker), once the world saw what was possible, a bevy of athletes charged through what was thought to be an impenetrable barrier.  By the end of 2014 we had a sanctioned world championship, complete with sponsors and on-line streaming video coverage.

The record has been lowered four times in the last 18 months, most recently two weeks ago by Canadian Lewis Kent, which I'm going to use as a jumping-off point for the discussion I want to have about legitimacy and perception.


OK, first things first: I have no doubt Lewis Kent ran a 4:51 beer mile.  I'm not accusing anyone of cheating, fabrication, or anything like that.  The record has been ratified and I have no problem with that whatsoever.  That is not the point I'm trying to make in any way, shape, or form, so let's make that clear.

I was struck when watching the video, however, that neither Kent nor Phil Parrot-Migas, who ran an impressive 5:07, emptied their beers prior to starting their laps.  Beer mile tradition holds that a competitor overturn their empty can or bottle over their head, to demonstrate that the vessel is indeed empty, before leaving the drinking zone.  Now, that isn't an official "rule".  Beermile.com, which bills itself as "the official beer mile resource" and is generally responsible for ratifying performances and codifying the rules, states: "It is strongly recommended, when attempting official records, to tip the empty beer can or bottle over your head at the end of a chug to verify an empty vessel." (italics mine) But it is certainly traditional, and I was surprised that in a well-publicized record attempt, neither of them would adhere to that tradition.  (Plus, it makes for an appealing visual, and hearkens back to the sports' underground roots.)  James Nielsen does it in his video:



So maybe it's not required, but it certainly helps, and again, while I have no doubt that the record was legitimate, it seemed unlikely to me that it would get ratified, and I said as much:

Jason Friedman I don't understand. Turning your empties over to demonstrate they are empty is one of the most basic rules of beer miling. It is not hard to remember to do. Neither of these guys did it once. No way this gets ratified.
Ultra Runner Podcast Excellent point.
Steve Havas They collect all the bottles and measure the amount left over to make sure it is within the legal limits
Jason Friedman The legal amount left over is zero. The beer has to be finished. Pour it over your head like everyone else in the world.


However, it did get ratified, and someone threw out an explanation on the URP Daily News:

Chris says:
beermile.com/rules only says that inverting the vessel over your cranium is “strongly recommended”
As the speed of chugging has increased, so too has the amount of foam left in the bottles, which wouldn’t come out. True record attempts now get a second person involved who pour any remaining foam / settled liquid into glasses, to see how much was left. I think a de facto rule has come into effect that basically says that the total amount of foam left in the bottles or cans cannot exceed 3 oz.
So here we arrive at the crux of the issue.  To me there are almost too many issues with the statement to count.  "As the speed of chugging has increased, so too has the amount of foam left in the bottles, which wouldn't come out"?  What this boils down to is: if you drink your beer fast enough, you don't have to drink all of it.  How is this acceptable?  The beer mile is a test of drinking quickly and running quickly, and most importantly of balancing the two.  You're drinking so fast that you can't get all the foam out?  I have a solution for you: drink slower.  
If someone claimed they were drinking so fast they couldn't get it all into their mouth in time, so a little bit of beer spilled onto their shirts, but if they wrung out their shirts and it was less than three ounces then that was OK, they'd be laughed at.  How is this different?  
"...a de facto rule has come into effect that basically says the total amount of foam left over in the bottles or cans cannot exceed 3 oz."  No.  No good.  You cannot have a sport where world records are being attempted, recorded, and ratified, that invokes "a de facto rule" that does not appear on the website of what is the sport's "de facto" governing body.  There are a clear list of rules on the website.  Follow them.  
If beer mile.com wants to adopt a "3 oz of foam" rule, go ahead.  But they do so at their peril.  As much as the Beer Mile is an underground event, there is clearly a non-negligible element of the sport that is striving for legitimacy and recognition.  Later this week Flotrack will host the second Beer Mile World Championships in Austin, TX.  This is an event that attracts sponsors and money.  Both Flotrack and beermile.com sell beer mile-related gear on their websites.  Lewis Kent just signed an endorsement deal with Brooks.  Don't think this has garnered any widespread recognition?  That last link--with an accompanying three-minute video--is from ESPN.com.
My point is that the beer mile is having a moment in terms of mainstream appeal that distance running rarely achieves, and that this is a very tenuous thing.  Many non-runners, and runners who are non-beer milers, are drawn to the event because of its absurdity but also because of its simplicity.  Four beers, four laps.  If you start placing qualifiers and exceptions onto that simplicity, it will not be long before the mainstream public loses patience.  "You have to drink four beers, but you can leave a little at the bottom of each one"?  The public will see that for what it is: a cop-out.  (As an aside, it's not an insignificant amount.  Three ounces is about 6% of the total volume of 48 oz. in a beer mile.)
By all means, if people want to pursue the mainstreaming of the beer mile, with all the attendant publicity and money that implies, please do so.  It's fun!  But be careful when you start to play fast and loose with the rules.  To the public, the fact that we have rules is the funniest part.  Without that, you've got nothing.

Race Report: Water Gap 50K

(All photos courtesy of Joe Azze and Mountain Peak Fitness.)

I'm tempted to say it's been a long season.  I ran my first race of 2015 on January 3, even though it was pretty low-key; the first of my two 'A' races for the year was at the end of February.  By mid-October I might be ready for a break.  But in reality, it doesn't feel like that long a season.  All of my races were crammed into the first half of the year; since the Whiteface Skyrunning weekend at the end of June, I've barely raced at all.  Maybe it'd be more accurate to think of the year as two separate seasons, with July serving as a recovery period, and this fall being the first part of a longer 2015-16 campaign that will probably stretch into next summer.  So, depending on your point of view, I either wrapped up the 2015 season or kicked off the 2016 season last weekend at the Water Gap 50K.

As a member of the Mountain Peak Fitness/Red Newt Racing team, I'm certainly encouraged to enter Red Newt events.  But even if I wasn't on the team, these races would be at the top of my list.  Ian Golden, who I've mentioned multiple times before, is a truly great race director, with an outstanding vision of what he wants his races to be, and the ability to shepherd those visions into reality.  Water Gap was the last event on the 2015 schedule for Red Newt Racing, and it promised to be something unique for a Red Newt race: fast.  Ian has a (well-deserved) reputation for courses that are not only beautiful but extremely challenging; anyone who has run Breakneck Point, Whiteface, or Virgil Crest can confirm how difficult those courses can be.  Ian further solidified that reputation this year by co-directing (with Charlie Gadol and Mike Siudy) two of the most notoriously difficult trail races in the Northeast, Manitou's Revenge and Cat's Tail Trail Marathon.  Even Cayuga, while eminently runnable, is a very difficult course that is easily 60-90 minutes slower than a "fast" 50 mile.  So when Ian declares a course to be "fast," that needs to be taken with a grain of salt.  The Water Gap course seemed to fit the bill, though: 31 miles of almost exclusively graded double-track, with only about 2000 feet of climbing.  A welcome change from what I'd been racing earlier in the year.  As always with a Red Newt event, I knew the competition would be stiff, at the very least from whatever of my ultra-fast teammates would show up that day.  But I was excited to get back into racing after a pretty long layoff.  Even though I wasn't in top racing form--probably more like 85%--I thought I could run near four hours on the course, which would be a nice stimulus for the training block leading up to January (more on that later).

I spent the night before the race camping near the finish with Elizabeth, Joe, Natalie, Lenny, and Ian; all would be volunteering on race day (along with several other teammates: Scotie, Zsuzsanna, Julian, and Amy; hopefully I didn't forget anyone).  I woke up early and grabbed breakfast in downtown Milford, PA with Joe and Mike Siudy before Joe gave us a lift to the start, 31 miles to the south.  The weather was perfect: clear and cool, in the low to mid 40s, with minimal wind.  At the start I met Phil Vondra, a frequent training partner, as well as teammates Carlo and Silas, who I expected to run away with the race.  Both had to be tired (Silas was on his third ultra-type effort in five weeks, following Virgil and Cat's Tail; while Carlo was only six days off a sterling 2:35 in Chicago) but both are strong runners who had to be considered the favorites.  Phil and I had a quick strategy session and decided to try to run 8:00/mile pace for at least the first ten miles, then reassess.  As I was basically training through, still running 75-85 mpw, and Phil was tired from a heavy week of drinking (it's an occupational hazard, apparently), a conservative approach seemed prudent.  So at least we had a plan in place that we could immediately ignore as soon as the gun went off.

Carlo and Silas went immediately to the front, joined by Justin Weiler (a strong upstate NY runner coming off of an excellent 3:44 at the Green Lakes 50K) and Tony Kharitonov (a solid masters runner from NJ).  Phil and I formed a chase pack with Jay Lemos, who was finishing up what truly was a long season that had included an impressive second place at the Eastern States 100.  We came through the first mile in 7:25 or so, obviously much faster than we had wanted, about 10 seconds behind the leaders.  We were able to let them go without any problem after that, but despite our efforts to find 8:00 pace kept turning out miles in the 7:30-7:40 range.   Conditions were perfect, and the course as very flat in the opening miles, so we maintained the pace, chatting constantly and every mile making noises about slowing down without actually doing so.

Catching Tony, just before AS1.
Just past the five-mile mark came one of the few decent-sized climbs on the course, about 3/4 of a mile long with multiple switchbacks leading up to AS1 (about 10K in).  I led our group uphill at a low intensity level.  We caught Tony at the top and the four of us ran together through the aid station.  I went through without stopping; Phil caught up within a minute, but it took Jay and Tony about a mile to rejoin us, and we continued on, running our 7:35s or so.  After a couple of rolling miles the course flattened out again and remained so for the next 12 miles or so.  Tony dropped back after the 10 mile mark and the three of us passed AS2 in the same fashion.  The miles clicked off fairly easily.  We still made overtures about slowing down, but as we neared halfway we figured we might as well keep on the pace as long as everyone felt good.  The terrain made it very easy to find a rhythm; our splits hovered around 7:30 with less than a few seconds of variation either way.  We were still chatting easily.  Jay had made a game of jumping over the three-foot-high barriers every time we crossed a park road or bridge, which kept Phil and I pretty entertained.

Through AS3 at 14 miles the pace remained steady; I ran through again without stopping while Phil and Jay stopped to refuel.  At this point I had yet to take in any nutrition other than some sips of water.  I felt a little bad not waiting for the guys at the aid stations, but at the same time, I had made the decision to go with the handheld so that I wouldn't have to stop.  Neither of them were carrying water.  We had each made our choice on either side of the tradeoff.  I couldn't feel guilty.

Our little pack, doin'' work.
My strategy was starting to pay off, though.  I kept running my 7:30s, not consciously trying to get a gap--I was having too much fun running with those guys to try to go solo at this point--but it was putting pressure on them to run a little faster to catch back up after each break.  After AS3 it took them almost a full mile to come back, having had to run well under 7:00 to do so.  These surges, however short, had to take something out of them.  After halfway (1:58) Jay had stopped leaping over the barriers, and through the 17 mile mark conversation had tapered off dramatically.  I took my first GU right around the two hour mark.  I was still feeling great.  The pace was starting to inch down a little bit, but it felt almost effortless, and we were getting into the stages of the race where getting a little more aggressive was OK.  Miles 18 and 19 were run at about 7:15 pace, and past the 19-mile mark Jay and Phil started to fall away.  I soloed on, into what had become a bit of a bothersome headwind, and took a second GU just before AS4 at 20.5 miles.  I made my only stop here, to refill my bottle, drop in a GU Brew tablet, and pee, giving up about 30 seconds before getting back out on course.


The course started getting a bit tougher.  Some rolling hills mixed with some short singletrack sections.  I started feeling some discomfort in my right patellar tendon, which has bothered me on an off for some time, though not to a significant degree; and also some tightness in the left hamstring.  I adjusted my stride, slowed to about 7:45 pace, and pushed forward.  The miles clicked by.  I passed the marathon mark at 3:18, approaching the final aid station.  On a long, flat, straight stretch approaching the checkpoint, I saw a flash of a green t-shirt leaving the aid station: Justin, in third.  That was a boost.  I had five miles to catch him and was obviously making up ground; I hadn't seen any of the top three since the opening twenty minutes or so.  I passed through AS5 feeling strong and ready to hunt.  Joe was waiting for me in the woods about half a mile later, filming me at the bottom of a technical singletrack descent.  He confirmed that Justin was just up ahead.  (Also that Silas and Carlo had about a mile lead on us at that point.)  We were in the midst of the most difficult section of the course--some steep singletrack with alot of sidehill running and thick leaf cover, obscuring the rocks and roots and making for some pretty slow going.  My pace had slowed to near 10:00/mile, but by the 27-mile mark I had caught and passed Justin.

Navigating some singletrack

About a mile later the singletrack ended and I started opening up the stride again.  I wasn't particularly concerned about getting caught--I felt pretty confident no one was coming back on my at this point--but four hours was looking possible, even likely if I could recapture my earlier rhythm.  I was able to drop down to 7:03 pace for mile 29 and 7:10 or so for mile 30, at which point I relaxed a little bit through the final finishing stretches, coming home in 3:57 for a nearly evenly split performance (1:58/1:59).

Silas and Carlo ran together the whole way, turning in an outstanding 3:44; my third-place finish made it a podium sweep for MPF/RNR, which was pretty sweet.  Justin gutted out a tough fourth, while Phil maintained a nice pace for fifth in 4:04.  All in all, a very successful day for me.  I met my goals of top five, top master, and four hours, all while training through.  The course was beautiful, the weather was perfect, the volunteers were great, and having Phil, Jay, Mike, and the whole MPF/RNR there at the end made for fantastic camaraderie.

I couldn't have asked for a better end, or beginning, to the season.  I've got some small stuff coming up--a couple of 5Ks and 10Ks--including my high school alumni race, always a highlight of my year, and I think a beer mile as well.  But I'm keeping the volume and intensity fairly high for the next few weeks, hopefully building to a large training block in December, leading into the main attraction for the next few months: Bandera 100K, the USATF championships, on January 6.  I'll be heading out with Phil and Elizabeth.  All of us will be looking to get our lottery tickets for Western States in 2017; Phil and I will be attempting our first 100Ks.  I'm planning on a big first half of 2016.  Bandera is one of three national championships I'm targeting in my first year as a master (Caumsett in March, Cayuga in May); I won't win any national titles, but some age-group medals could be possible.  And I'm toying with the idea of a couple of timed events as well, maybe a six hour, and possible even a 24-hour in July.  Could be a big year!  Stay tuned.


Ultra running National Rankings: Fall Update

photo: the North Face
photo: Runners World
OK.  First off, if you're wondering what this is all about, or how I came up with this, go back and read the first Ultra National Rankings post I put up in June.  Briefly, as a fan of top-level ultra running, I thought it would be fun to have a system to rank elites (and non-elites) in an objective way.  So, I came up with a system.  The original post outlines much of the thought process that went into it and addresses some of the issues that I've identified with the system (some of which will be tweaked next year, some which will be left alone because I don't think they need changing, and some which are inherent to the system and just won't be able to be fixed).  It's pretty long, but it gives you a good idea of where this comes from, so if you think this might be at all interesting to you, I'd encourage you to read it.  There are a bunch of comments on that post also, much of which is a pretty interesting discussion (which was kind of the whole point), so check those out too.

At the end of that post I listed the top 50 men and women for the year, through May 31.  I'd like to remind everyone that it's not just the top 50 that are ranked; I have, at this point, over 2200 women and 2400 men who have earned at least one ranking point for the year.  Fifty just seemed like a good number to put on the blog, but you can view the entire list if you want.  (Fifty wasn't completely arbitrary either; starting next year, the top 50 will all count toward determining the "field strength multiplier" for each race (which is going to mean so much more work for me, ugh)).  I'm constantly updating the list each week, but my goal was to publish an updated top 50 every few months for people to see.  But, as I explained last week, my computer died, and I fell multiple weeks behind in August and September, so I've just now caught up and have a fresh top 50 for you, which you can scroll down to the bottom of this post to see.

All in all, I'm pretty happy with how the rankings are reflecting the results so far.  As you might have guessed by the pics leading off this post, Western States champs Rob Krar and Magdalena Boulet are leading the respective lists, both of whom would be tough to argue with at this point.  Looking down the rest of the top 10-20 on either side, I think the system has done a good job of identifying some folks who are really having some great years.  A few people might be a little over-valued by being prolific, which may get tweaked a little bit next year.  But, being prolific is a skill, too.  It's hard to run an ultra a month at a high level and stay healthy, so in the abstract at least, I don't have too much of an issue with it.

One aspect of this whole project that I've enjoyed the most is that it really highlights athletes who are having outstanding seasons that probably don't get enough attention or credit.  (Not that everyone necessarily wants that, but...)  I mean, everyone knows about Rob's and Magdalena's exploits, but before I did this, I never would have realized how great a year Kathleen Cusick is having, or Paul Terranova, or Nicole Studer, or Bob Shebest.  Hopefully this throws at least a little bit of a spotlight on those folks who aren't the household names in our sport, but are having great years nonetheless.

Of course, it's nowhere near perfect.  Two folks who are definitely too low are Sage Canaday and Camille Herron, both because they haven't run a ton of ultras this year.  Both have run some fast road marathons, which cut into their ultra schedules.  Sage's injury-related DNF at UTMB obviously cost him a shot at a lot of points.  Camille is ranked pretty high at 14th despite having run only two ultras, but in those two races she's won a national title and a world championship, and I'd like to see her in the top 10 at least.  But I think everyone in the top 10 really is deserving.

We'll see how the rest of the season plays out.  Magda has probably locked up the top ranking for the women for the year--and deservedly so, in my opinion--but the top placings on the mens' side are very much up for grabs, particularly with the TNF-EC championships on the not-too-distant horizon.  If we have some significant movement before then, I'll post an updated list in a month or so, but we'll see how it all shakes out.

Again, if you want to view the entire list (alphabetically, not numerically, sorry) please waste a bunch of time at work doing so.  As always, questions/comments/feedback/suggestions are encouraged.

Through October 1


Men
State
Points
Women
State
Points
1
Rob Krar
AZ
87.5
Magdalena Boulet
CA
171.6
2
Brian Rusiecki
MA
74.75
Stephanie Howe
OR
89.7
3
David Laney
OR
71.1
Aliza Lapierre
VT
78.6
4
Ian Sharman
CA
69.5
Kathleen Cusick
VA
78
5
Seth Swanson
MT
67.8
Kaci Lickteig
NE
73.275
6
Alex Nichols
CO
57.8
Nicole Studer
TX
71.275
7
Bob Shebest
CA
54
Cassie Scallon
CO
61.6
8
Alex Varner
CA
52.6
Larissa Dannis
CA
58.2
9
Jared Hazen
CO
52
Kerrie Bruxvoort
CO
49.4
10
Paul Terranova
TX
52
Hillary Allen
CO
49.25
11
Chikara Omine
CA
50
Katalin Nagy
FL
47.5
12
Justin Houck
WA
48
Emily Richards
NV
46.6
13
Ryan Bak
OR
48
Rachel Ragona
CA
45.25
14
Mario Mendoza
CA
47
Camille Herron
OK
45
15
Benjamin Stern
CA
46.2
Jacqueline Palmer
DE
42
16
Andrew Miller
OR
46
Caroline Boller
CA
41.95
17
Dylan Bowman
CA
44.1
Ashley Erba
CO
40.9
18
Gediminas Grinius
LTH
44
Traci Falbo
IN
40.3
19
Jean Pommier
CA
42
Emma Roca
WV
39.75
20
Ryan Kaiser
OR
41
Lee Conner
OH
39.5
21
Jorge Pacheco
CA
39.3
Angela Shartel
CA
39
22
Mario Martinez
CA
38.4
Silke Koester
CO
37.4
23
Ryan Smith
CO
37.8
Kara Henry
CO
37
24
David Herr
VT
37
Darcy Piceau
CO
34.375
25
Michael Borst
WI
37
Beverly Anderson-Abbs
CA
33.6
26
Nate Jaqua
OR
36
Ashley Lister
PA
32.8
27
Mike Foote
MT
35
Robin Watkins
DC
32.1
28
Michael Wardian
VA
34.85
Meghan Arbogast
CA
32.075
29
Jorge Maravilla
CA
34.6
Alissa St. Laurent
Can
32
30
Sage Canaday
CO
34.5
Amanda Basham
OR
32
31
Christopher Denucci
CA
33.3
Sara Bard
MA
31.225
32
Tim Tollefson
CA
31.5
Joelle Vaught
ID
31.05
33
Tyler Green
OR
30.5
Ashley Nordell
OR
31
34
Chris Vizcaino
CA
30
Mallory Richard
Can
31
35
Nate Polaske
AZ
30
Megan Stegemiller
VA
31
36
Scott Breeden
IN
30
Darla Askew
OR
30.6
37
Scott Traer
MA
30
Neela D’Souza
Can
30.5
38
Timmy Parr
CO
29.5
Janessa Taylor
OR
30
39
Lon Freeman
CA
29
Megan Roche
CA
30
40
Jeff Browning
OR
28.7
Katrin Silva
NM
29.95
41
Daven Oskvig
NY
28.5
Bree Lambert
CA
29.75
42
Nickademus Hollon
CA
27.25
Melanie Fryar
TX
29
43
Mark Austin
ID
27
Kerrie Wlad
CO
28.6
44
Mark Hammond
UT
27
Laura Richard
CA
28.1
45
Oswaldo Lopez
CA
27
Leslie Semler
MA
28.1
46
Karl Schnaitter
CA
26.5
Luanne Park
CA
26.525
47
Nathan Stroh
OR
26.5
Amie Blackham
UT
26
48
Ford Smith
TX
26
Amy Rusiecki
MA
26
49
Gabe Wishnie
WA
26
Suzanna Bon
CA
26
50
Michael Owen
OH
26
Catrin Jones
Can
25.8

Pete Kostelnick
NE
26




Ray Sanchez
CA
26



















Summer blues...rankings coming...

Nobody likes a bunch of excuses, but I don't care what people like.  So here's a bunch of excuses.

Haven't had much to report over the summer.  As I alluded to in my last post, I really jammed up my back while we were on vacation in South Carolina in early July.  I was on a planned running break, but it did take me a little longer than anticipated to get back into the flow.  And as I started rounding back into shape at the end of July, I got hit with what I think was another bout of Lyme disease.  I had a couple of days of feeling very tired and sluggish on easy runs--I could barely keep up with Ben on an easy training run the day before he won Escarpment an amazing 13th time--and then a couple of days of high fevers, nausea, and general aching, pretty similar to what I experienced last year.  A course of antibiotics had me feeling better in a couple of weeks, but by that time August was almost over.

In late August we went to Vermont and Canada for ten days, which was a lot of fun.  I trained moderately, putting in about 60-70 miles a week, without much real quality.  As I mentioned earlier in the year, I've been having some success with a LCHF diet this year, but it's a pain in the ass when you're not at home, so I took a three-week hiatus during our trip and our first week back home (I wasn't going to skip pizza and beer on my birthday).  We ate a lot of poutine, which is really fantastic.  I went back on the diet after Labor Day and dropped my vacation weight almost immediately, but it takes several weeks for the running to come back around while I'm still adapting to the low-carb thing, so I had a sluggish September.  It was OK--not much on the horizon until the Water Gap 50K in a few weeks--but not much to report on the blogging front.

I was planning on updating the US Ultra Rankings in late August, before UTMB.  But just before leaving on vacation, our ten-year-old laptop died, and it took several weeks to replace.  Also, I switched jobs at the end of the month, and while my new gig is much better, I don't have access to Google Docs on the computers at work.  (Plus, ultrarunning.com and Ultrasignup are both blocked on the hospital network.)  So, I fell about six weeks behind on the rankings, and I just got caught up last night.  I'm waiting on a few straggler results to come in from last weekend, but I'll have a post with the new rankings (through 10/1) up early next week.


I did jump in a local race a few weeks ago, the Roosa Gap Roller Coaster, an 11.5-mile road race in Wurtsboro, about thirty miles away.  It's a long-running event that I've always wanted to try, and though I certainly wasn't race fit, I was glad to get out for a good hard run.  It was about a third of the way in, struggling to run 6:30s on the flat early section of the course, that I realized I wasn't yet fat-adapted and that my body was rebelling against a hard effort on no carbs.  Oh well.  It was basically a solo effort, as I got dropped by the two leaders in the first mile and had about 30 seconds on fourth the rest of the way.  The course is a flat first four miles along the old D&H canal towpath, before it turns onto some local roads and climbs almost 1000 feet in the next two miles.  I went from running 6:40s to running 9:30s but started making up a little ground on second place.  We leveled out a bit past the six-mile mark and the course entered the "roller coaster" phase, about three miles of rolling pavement.  I closed to about thirty seconds of second but couldn't get closer until the final two miles, where I dropped down to about 5:30 pace on the two-mile downhill finishing stretch and clawed the gap back another 10 seconds or so.  That was about as close as I got.  My 1:18 for the 11.5 miles was nothing to write home about, but again, struggling to return to form in terms of both fitness and diet, I was happy just to get a hard effort in.  (And, if the time for the course is indeed equivalent to a flat half-marathon, as the race organizers claim, was not a terrible performance.)

Two weeks later I'm starting to get a little rhythm, keeping the mileage in the 80-85 mpw range, running a decent track workout yesterday with my world-champion training partner, and overall feeling much stronger than I have recently.  As promised, I'll be back next week with an update to the rankings, and in a couple weeks I'll report back from Water Gap and have some updates on my plans going forward as a newly minted old person (I mean, masters runner).

Race Report: Whiteface Skyrunning Weekend Recap


It's only recently that I've begun to realize I'm not, in fact, a good hill runner.

In my all-too-distant past as a high school, collegiate, and post-collegiate runner, I always considered the hills to be my greatest strength.  I was most comfortable on the hilliest cross-country tracks in high school and college, and my limited road-racing success was usually forged via a decisive surge on whatever incline the course would offer.  I've never been much of a downhill runner, but I felt like I could climb with almost anybody--short and steep, long and punishing, whatever the race called for.

As I've become more immersed in the trail and ultra scene, however, I've learned that I am an unremarkable hill runner at best.  My results on hilly courses are no better or worse than whatever my fitness level on that day would lead me to expect.  In fact, hillier courses have become a bit of a bugaboo for me, as my complete lack of downhill prowess is exacerbated on the trails and usually negates whatever small gains I might be able to claw back going uphill.  I've come to find that the best courses for me are runnable ones, where I can bring my long (if mostly unremarkable) prior experience to bear in terms of running moderately fast for moderately long stretches of time.

In short, hills just aren't what they used to be.

But my rational brain is no match for my forebrain, and deep down in my reptilian core I reflexively still thing I'm a hill runner.  Which explains why I registered for the inaugural Whiteface Skyrunning weekend as soon as it opened last year, and then spent most of the past several months regretting it.

As regular readers of this blog know by now (my apologies to all of you), Ian Golden's Red Newt Racing venture (aside from being one of my fantastic sponsors) consistently puts on top-level races, with world-class fields, over what is generally both breathtaking and breathtakingly difficult terrain.  As part of the first-year US Skyrunning series, the Whiteface races promised nothing less.  Ian's co-director, Jan Wellford, also directs the notoriously difficult Great Adirondack Trail Run, has the course record at the insane Mantiou's Revenge, as well as the FKT for the epic Great Range Traverse.  The signs were all there--this was going to be one beast of a race.

Skyrunning--a trail running discipline involving steep ascents and descents, over technical terrain, often at altitude--has gained popularity in recent years, particularly in Europe, with the high-profile exploits of Killian Jornet.  Ian and Jan created an amazing facsimile of a European Skyrunning event, not least in choosing the venue: Whiteface Mountain, home of the alpine events at the 1980 Winter Olympics and featuring the largest elevation change of any ski resort in the eastern US.  Nearby Lake Placid, which has hosted two Olympic Games (including the famed Miracle on Ice) is the closest you'll get to a European mountain resort town this side of Aspen.  In true Skyrunning fashion, the weekend hosted two events: Saturday's Vertical Kilometer (VK), a 4K uphill-only race with 3300' of gain (you read that right, that's an average gradient of 25%); and Sunday's main event, the Skymarathon, nearly 20 miles with just under 10,000' of climbing--and equal descent.  With cash and Skyrunning Series points on the line, an expected world-class field descended on the mountain.

Chatting it up with Ben pre-race.
Photo: Ron Heerkins Jr.
My expectations going in were extremely low.  I was still recovering, both physically and emotionally, from what I considered to be a disappointing performance at the Cayuga Trails 50 four weeks earlier.  It had taken nearly two weeks for my body to feel right, and I was still dealing with some lingering soreness from our car accident the week before CT50.  Combine that with steep, technical trails, and I didn't give myself much of a chance to do anything of note.  I figured Saturday would be the best chance I had to accomplish anything.  Several of the top runners, including my MPF/RNR teammates Silas and Cole, were skipping the VK to focus on the Skymarathon; plus, I wouldn't have to deal with the insane descents that I was sure to struggle with on Sunday.  We gathered for the 10am start on Saturday under crystal-clear skies.  I lined up a few rows back, with Scotie and Ryan, but I immediately made my way near the front after the gun, running just behind Ben, in the back half of the top ten.  I was being a bit over-exuberant, but much of the first mile was runnable, and I split the mile mark in 14:00 flat, I think right around tenth place, behind a gaggle of top mountain runners (including women's leader Stevie Kramer) but holding what I thought was a pretty good position.

Ryan showing me how it's done.
Photo: Joe Azze

The trail got steeper and steeper, and became less and less of a trail.  Past the mile mark I was reduced to hiking like everybody else.  I'm not much of a power hiker, though--I just don't have a lot of practice at it--and I started slipping back in the field.  My lack of trekking poles--again, not something I ever use or am comfortable with--proved costly.  Try as I might, I couldn't get my breathing down to a manageable rate, or keep my heart rate anywhere south of 180 or so.  Past the two-mile mark, as I gasped for air, struggling to hang on to Ryan's back, I seriously considered just stopping and sitting down to the side of the trail (which was barely more than a rough-hewn rocky path up the ski slope).  I even had a little fantasy about what would happen.  I'd sit there on the side of the trail as everyone went by.  Then after the race people would realize that I hadn't made it up to the top, so they'd come find me.  I'd be sitting there, hours later, just trying to catch my breath.  And Ian would come tell me that I had to walk up to the finish, or back down to the start.  And I would very calmly tell him no, I was just going to sit there, and he was going to have to figure out a way to get me back down the mountain.  This all played out in my head as I tried not to die.

Dying, near the top.
Photo: Ron Heerkens Jr.

Eventually, much hiking later, I reached the top, just a few seconds behind Ryan (one of the great technical trail/mountain runners in the Northeast, ask anyone other than himself, because he won't admit it) in 18th place.  My calves were knots, but my quads were fine, and after cheering in the rest of my teammates, I trekked down to the summit of Little Whiteface, where I shared a gondola ride back to the base with Pearl Izumi runner Michael King, who had edged me out near the summit.  I wasn't relishing the thought of doing that same climb twice the next day, and headed back to Lake Placid to lick my wounds, seriously considering taking a Sunday DNS and just burying myself in a tankard of UBU.

 I'm not sure what got me out of bed at 4:30 am for the Sunday start.  It certainly wasn't the weather.  Forty-five degrees, with a steady downpour forecast to last all morning, and rumors of wind gusts over 40 mph on the summit.  The conditions made for some pretty tricky decisions regarding gear as we gathered in the base lodge that morning. With the course promising to be a mudfest, I opted to leave my trusty Salming T1s behind in favor of the more aggressive traction of the inov-8 X-Talon 212s. I donned a pair of knee high 2XU compression socks, more for warmth than for any performance benefits, and selected full-length arm warmers below my short sleeve racing top.  I topped everything with an ultra-lightweight Salming Pro360 jacket and my trusty Orange Mud trucker cap.  With no expectations, I loaded my shorts pockets with GU and got ready for the start.

Before the weekend started, I estimated the course might take me around five hours to complete; after Saturday's slog, I revised that to six hours. On this course, in these conditions, and against this field, I had no illusions of being anywhere in the top ten or twenty.  Instead, I was focused on simply having a good, smart, solid training stimulus.  Most crucially, I was determined not to continue my recent worrying trend of starting races too quickly.  I resolved to run the first Alpine loop with as little effort as possible.  If I could get through that first 10K feeling strong--no small feat, considering it would include about 8000' of elevation change--I knew that the next seven miles, on the Flume loop at the base of Whiteface Mountain, would afford the opportunity to open up on some runnable singletrack.  Sure, I still had to get through another Alpine loop after that, but I figured everyone would be pretty cooked by that point.

Ah, crap.

Determined to start slowly, I lined up at the very back of the field and was thrilled to find my good friend Glen Redpath right next to me.  Glen is a top-notch ultrarunner from NYC with three top-10 Western States finishes among his myriad accomplishments, but he's just now rounding back into shape following Achilles surgery last year, and he had just driven to Whiteface after running the Ragnar Trail relay in Massachusetts the day before.  So we were more than happy to head off at the back of the field, running at a slow, conversational pace as we headed up the lower slopes of the mountain in the driving rain.

The pack on the lower slopes.
Photo: Joe Azze
After a few minutes I left Glen behind and moved up tot the middle of the field, spending some time hiking and chatting with Natalie Thompson, Jay Lemos, and Mike King (I tried, unsuccessfully, to buy his trekking poles off him).  Right around the mile mark, I caught up with Ryan, who had stopped to take care of an issue with his shoe, and we fell in together, power hiking uphill at a steady, sustainable rate.  Unlike the previous day, when I had been redlining pretty much from the start, I kept my heart rate and breathing well under control, and we climbed at a much more relaxed pace between short bursts of conversation.  About halfway up, the course split, with ambiguous markings and no course officials; we followed a long line of runners ahead of us up the right-hand pathway.  After a few minutes, it became obvious that we were following the VK course uphill, which wasn't quite right; we were supposed to take a slightly different route up, and descend via the VK route.  As soon as we realized this, though, the leaders came barreling back down, and we figured out from a few shouted words back and forth that they had taken the same route.  So we trudged on.

Despite the wind, rain, and footing, the slight lessening of the effort and Ryan's companionship was making this ascent much more tolerable that that of the previous day, and I was almost disappointed when we reached the final pitches of the climb toward the top, amid a driving rain. We reached the top right around 55 minutes, just four or five minutes slower than the previous day, and I guessed there were about thirty or forty runners ahead of us struggling their way down as we made a quick check-in at the summit aid station, and, without stopping, turned back downhill.  In seconds, Ryan was gone, putting his fell running experience from his time in England to good use as he loped downhill, picking up five places in seconds.  I focused on getting downhill with a mixture of caution and aggression.  For the past few weeks, I'd been working on running downhills, especially technical ones, more aggressively, and it seemed to be working; I was heaving down 40% downhills with ankle-deep mud, terrified, but actually holding my own as compared to most of the runners around me, and as we reached a short level section about halfway down the mountain I had actually picked off a couple of guys myself.  

I reached the point where the trail had split, now manned by volunteers, who directed me back uphill for the second ascent of the loop, to the top of Little Whiteface at the terminus of the gondola.  This climb started off on a graded gravel access road, quite steep but amenable to a little running, and with a mixture of running and power hiking I reeled in a group of runners as we turned onto a steep pitch of ski trail for the last half-mile push to the top.  We hiked together, passing Ian, who confirmed that we had indeed, along with the rest of the front third of the field, taken the unintended way up to the summit.  He informed us that as a compromise, our times for the first loop wouldn't count--everyone had to finish the loop, he said, but our splits would be taken at the base lodge, and only everyone's time for the Flume loop and the second Alpine loop would count for the official results. We took a minute or two to digest this, and then I relaxed my pace; no sense in wasting energy now.  As we neared the summit, a couple of my nearest competitors broke into a jog; I held back, turned to the runner next to me, and asked, "What are we missing?"

We both shrugged and continued on together, taking it easy on the downhill and chatting.  I learned that his name was Brian Finch, from Killington, VT.  Remarkably, he had lived for ten years in New Paltz before moving to Killington, so we had plenty to talk about.  He is a professional downhill ski racer, and even at our relaxed pace, it showed; he was incredibly comfortable and confident over the rocky, uneven terrain.  Our former companions had disappeared up ahead, but that was fine; all we had to do was conserve energy to the bottom, when the now-abbreviated "real race" would start. The third or fourth-place female caught us near the bottom, and on the lower slopes I eased up even a little more, running through a quick mental checklist, making sure I was ready to start racing at the base.  I decided to keep my gear the same; the weather hadn't abated, and I was feeling, for the most part, pretty dry and comfortable.  I reached the base station right around 1:48, grabbed some hot broth from teammate Amy Hanlon, and headed out on the Flume loop, the clock now running.  

After a short uphill, the course ran comfortably downhill for a half mile before flattening out for a stretch along the river, and I felt fantastic, dipping down near 6:30 pace as I caught back up with, then blew past, Brian.  About a mile into the loop, I crossed paths with the lead pack of three, about four miles ahead of me, looking haggard but absolutely hammering each other.  I pressed on as we wound uphill into a twisting singletrack section.

Cole on the Flume Loop
Photo: Joe Azze

The rest of the Flume loop passed uneventfully. I pressed the pace at every opportunity, knowing that I had a two-hour hike coming at the end and wanting to make up as much ground as possible while I could could put my running background to good use.  After passing Brian, I saw no other runners for the remainder of the seven miles, until about half a mile before the end of the loop, when a string of three or four runners suddenly appeared ahead of me.  Buoyed by the knowledge that I was gaining on people, I charged into the aid station in the group, having completed the seven-plus miles in just under 63 minutes, still in the driving rain.

The rain had given some signs of abating slightly over the last ten minutes or so, and I made the decision to shed my Salming shell for the final Alpine loop.  (It performed brilliantly; for an incredibly thin, light piece, it did a remarkable job against the rain and the wind, though it is not completely waterproof.)  I changed into a dry race shirt, my trusty Yard Owl jersey, but left my arm sleeves on; the summit was bound to be cold, and I didn't need a bout with hypothermia. I grabbed a few quick handfuls of food, took a deep breath to steel myself, and headed back out into the rain for the final loop.

Through the rain, a few runners were still gamely battling downhill, finishing their first loop.  I turned the corner to head up the lower slopes, and there it was--a line of at least eight runners, laid out in front of me, over the next half mile.  Slowly, I set about the task of picking them off, and slowly, it happened.  Within the first mile, five of them or so; we grunted acknowledgement at each other and offered brief words of encouragement. About a mile up, I caught up with the familiar form of Mike King and his hiking poles; he fell in with me and we climbed together for awhile, but I was pressing the pace and solitary hikers kept appearing in the mist in front of me.  I kept my head down and pushed on.  My mantra became, "Purposeful movement."  After Saturday's brutal slog, I knew that not all hiking was equal; I had spent much of the previous morning moving listlessly uphill.  Now, I focused on making each step strong and purposeful, in constrast to some of the flagging runners I saw ahead of me.  Slowly, slowly, I drew them in.  As we neared the summit, the conditions worsened.  Fog had settled in over the mountaintop, limiting visibility to about a hundred feet.  Gusting wind blew the rain sideways.  But we were almost there.  Just before the summit aid station, I made my tenth catch of the climb: my teammate Cole.  He was clearly having a tough time in the conditions, but just the fact that I was anywhere near a runner of his caliber confirmed that I was going pretty well.  I stopped inside the aid station for two cups of hot broth and a chance to tighten my shoelaces for the upcoming descent, and then I was back out in it, the fog and the wind and the rain, barreling down the rocky, muddy slope.  

It was a terrifying descent.  The wind gusts felt like they would blow me off the side of the mountain; I had to carry my hat to prevent it from blowing off my head.  My hands were starting to go numb.  The mud was mid-calf in spots, pockmarked with large rocks and tree stumps.  Somehow I re-caught Cole and one of the other runners who had beaten me out of the aid station, re-passed them, and pulled away.  The trail flattened out briefly and suddenly I was heading back up the access road toward Little Whiteface, the final climb of the day.  I fell back into my rhythm, repeating in my head, purposeful movement, purposeful movement.  I could hear the click click of Mike and his trekking poles behind me, but otherwise we seemed to be alone as we ascended to the top.

I left the final aid station about twenty seconds ahead of Mike and started attacking the final two-mile downhill stretch.  The mud was insanely slippery, causing me to slide several feet with each stride.  Twice I fell flat on my back but fortunately popped right back up, miraculously avoiding any of the rocks that would have caused me serious injury.  I lost complete control of my balance down one stretch and careered out of control over a short rock escarpment, somehow finding footing on the other side and continuing downhill. I knew Mike would catch me--he had proved earlier to be a much smoother descender, and his poles lent him a decided advantage in stability--but I knew he had started the Flume loop several minutes ahead of me.  If I could keep it close, I should have enough time in hand to preserve my placing.  

He did catch me, about halfway down the hill, and we ran together for awhile.  I locked onto his pace at best as I could, trying to walk the fine line between safety and aggression, until finally the base station came into view, and I relaxed, letting Mike open up a small gap.  I cruised across the line in a cumulative time of 4:44:19, relieved to be finished and pretty pleased with how the day had turned out.
Ultimately Jan and Ian decided to use the cumulative time as the official results, since using the 2-loop splits hadn't altered the scoring places at all for the top seven or eight runners.  There was a good bit of discrepancy beyond that, however, and I was pretty disappointed to find out that my 17th place would be the official result, and not the 14th I would have earned for the 2-loop split.  I sympathize with the difficult situation that Jan and Ian faced, and ultimately I accept their decision, though I can't say I understand it, or that I'm happy about it. My 2-loop performance was actually fairly solid, leaving me less than 15 seconds behind women's leaders Kasie Enman and Stevie Kramer, and barely a minute behind Ryan, in tenth place.  For a course that far outside of my comfort zone, against mountain runners of their caliber, I thought it was a very good result.  

Much kudos to Jan and Ian for putting on such an amazing event.  On that course, in those conditions, I would've expected a miserable experience. The fact that I actually enjoyed it is a testament to their skill as race directors. 

The race left my legs absolutely brutalized.  I've taken most of the last two weeks off to recover from that weekend and from the cumulative effects of a mostly successful first six months of 2015.  I'm ready to get back to training and building up for some fall races (I won't race again until probably September), but unfortunately I messed up my back something major a couple of days ago and am just now able to get around after two days in bed.  So...stay tuned.  

Ultrarunning National Rankings

 

We are living in the midst of the ultrarunning boom.

Frank Shorter's victory in the Olympic Marathon in Munich in 1972 is often cited as the launching point of the US running boom.  The explosion in popularity of "jogging" and road-racing in general (and marathons in particular) has its roots in that legendary race, as well as the publication of Jim Fixx's seminal The Complete Book of Running which was published in 1977.  Forty years later, ultrarunning is having its moment.  The success of Dean Karnazes' Ultramarathon Man and Chris McDougal's Born to Run have helped to fuel an unprecendented growth in ultramarathon participation.  An estimated 70,000 folks will complete an ultra this year, an increase of over 400% in the past fifteen years, according to Ultrarunning Magazine, the bible of the sport.

While it's still not exactly mainstream--that's about 12% of the 540,000 marathoners this year, not exactly a mainstream sport itself--the interest in our little niche has certainly swelled to unprecedented levels.  Sponsorship money is flowing--well, maybe not flowing per se, but at least trickling in.  Ultrarunnerpodcast and Talk Ultra boast thousands of downloads a month.  Ultrasportslive TV and irunfar.com provide live coverage of major races.  Stupid blogs like this one seem to be multiplying like rabbits.

So I've decided to do my part in servicing the Ultrarunning Boom.  If we're going to be a mainstream sport, let's act like it, dammit!  Let's get in on the sports conversation. Forget fighting about whether LeBron could take MJ one-on-one.  We want people arguing in bars (or, more likely, craft-beer tasting rooms) about who the best ultrarunners are, right?  Well, fear not.  Your prayers have been answered with the Ultrarunning National Rankings.

In truth, I've been kicking this idea around for a few years.  I train with alot of tri-geeks, and they all have their national rankings, both overall and for their age groups, courtesy of USAT.  I thought that was pretty cool, and thought a similar idea--a national ranking for any ultrarunning finisher in the country--would be pretty awesome.  I didn't particularly like the USAT formula, though, which involves comparing performances to estimated times by certain "pacesetters" in the race.  I didn't love the Ultrasignup rankings either, which work similarly, by awarding finishers a percentage of the race winner's time--it penalizes folks for racing in competitive fields, and rewards those who only run races they know they can win.  (Though admittedly the database power of Ultrasignup, allowing them to rank absolutely everybody, is very impressive.)  I wanted a system that acknowledged that not all races were created equal.  And so I found my model: golf.

The World Golf Rankings are very complicated, and may not be perfect, but they provided the basis for what I wanted in my system.  In the WGR, players accumulate points via their performances in tournaments on the various world tours.  The tours are all ranked--the US tour tanks the highest, followed by the European tour, and there are various factors for the Australian tour, the Japanese tour, and all the various mini-tours around the country--and the events within those tours are all ranked, too, based on how many of the top players in the world are playing.  Each tournament is assigned a value of importance--the majors are the highest, of course, with the World Golf Championships a step below.  The combination of what tour is involved, what the event is, and how many top players are there, determines how many ranking points are available, and how many players at that tournament will receive points.  The cumulative points are then divided by the number of events the player finished, and the result gives the player the number used for their ranking.

This was what I wanted.  Just like in golf, some events on the ultra calendar--Western States, Leadville, UTMB--are more important than others.  Placing highly in those events should carry more weight.  After all, which impresses you more: my win in a local 50K, or, say, Dominic Grossman's 19th-place finish at States last year?  (If you have to think about it, the rest of this post probably isn't for you.)  I could simplify things somewhat--ultrarunning doesn't have tours, for one thing--but the basic ideas were there.  Win small events, get a bit of credit.  Win bigger events, get more credit.  Beat the best runners in the country, get even more.

Initially, I had envisioned something akin to what USAT and Ultrasignup provided: a ranking for every finisher of an ultramarathon in the US.  Quickly, though, the impracticality of this idea became apparent.  First of all, there was just too much data to enter manually.  I don't have an automated database like Ultrasignup does, and I can't manually enter, say, 1100 finishers at JFK into a spreadsheet.  Plus, even if I figured out a way to automate it, more problems reared their head.  For one, duplicate names--how would I deal with, say, having five different Matt Smiths in the results?  (I've encountered this problem on Ultrasignup, which sometimes confuses me with another Jason Friedman about my age who happens to live less than 100 miles away.)  Limiting the rankings to top finishers doesn't eliminate this problem, of course, but makes it much more manageable.  Also, golf doesn't award points for every finisher--you have to hit a certain minimum criteria at a tournament for ranking points to become available.   That might mean making the cut, or the top 20, or whatever.  But not everyone gets points.  So not every finisher was going to get a ranking.  I had to make peace with that.

Trying to be as comprehensive as possible, I'm including every domestic race I can, as well as major international ones which might attract the top US talent.  Using the Ultrarunning Magazine race calendar, I started by assigning each race a score on a five-point scale.  Most races were ranked as Level 1: there are over 1000 ultras in the country, and you haven't heard of the overwhelming majority of them.  Level 2 races are slightly more prestigious--they might have some local or regional cachet, or they might have some name recognition by virtue of being associated with a race where a different distance is more important--say, the Ice Age 50K, which gains some prestige by riding the coattails of the Ice Age 50 Mile, but is decidedly the less important of the two events.  Level 3 races have a strong regional importance and maybe some mild prominence on the national stage, but aren't quite attracting the top fields--think Leona Divide or Umstead.  Level 4 races are national-class events--Miwok, Chuckanut, Speedgoat--that are separated from the top only by degrees.  (By default, I assigned all national championship races a Level 4.  They should be a big deal, even though not every US championship is created equal.)  Level 5 is reserved for the true majors: States, Leadville, Sonoma, North Face, and a handful of others that if you win, you just consider retiring right there on the spot since it probably will never get any better.  IAU World Championships and World Cup races are automatically granted a Level 5.

Using the same ratios for points and places that are used by the WGR, I then established how many points were available for each level of race, and how deep the scoring fields go.  A Level 1 race is worth five points to the winner, three for second, and one for third.  Level 2 races score out to the top 5; Level 3 the top 10; Level 4 the top 15; and Level 5 the top 25.  Generally, second place is worth about 60% of the points of first place (again, similar to the WGR), placing a premium on wins, which I like.

Next, we have to calculate a multiplier for strength of field--I want to reward people for racing against the best.  For the WGR, the top 200 in the world are used to calculate field strength; I settled on the top 50.  Each spot in the top 50 is assigned a point value, and those values correspond to a certain factor by which every finishing spot in that race is multiplied.  Of course, this is the first time we've done this, so there is no top 50 to work off of.  Instead, I used the results of the Ultrarunning magazine Ultrarunner of the Year voting from 2014 to set a baseline top 10 for the men and women.  When any of those top 10 run in an event this year, that race is worth correspondingly more points.  Not only does this place a high importance on seeking out top competition, it also acts as a reward for those who have previously achieved a high ranking.  (Once I have enough data for a reliable top 50, this multiplier effect will become a bit more pronounced.)

I decided to base the rankings on the sum of the points earned, not a per-event average, for several reasons that I will get into later.  At this point, my formula was set, and I started the (rather laborious) task of compiling results and manually entering the data into a spreadsheet.  It's a painstaking process.  I use the Ultrarunning website, as well as Ultrasignup, and I wind up doing a lot of Google searches to find results that aren't posted there.  So far, out of the 575 or so races that I have listed through the weekend of May 31, I've found results on about 90-95% of them (several were cancelled or have been removed from consideration due to fat-ass status or other situations that will make getting results unlikely).  In all, over 1400 men and 1300 women have earned at least one ranking point so far this year.

Before I unveil the actual rankings, I know you probably have some questions/concerns/criticisms.  I'm going to try to anticipate some of them now, and address them as best as I can by trying to explain my reasoning. 

Ultra rankings won't work.  You're comparing all different kinds of events: road, trails, track, timed events.  Different runners have different strengths.
True, but that's a feature, not a bug.  That's exactly why I think this is a cool idea.  You can accumulate points in any race, in any discipline.  In theory, the most well-rounded athlete should have the best chance achieving a top ranking.  Think about golf: some courses are long, some short, some with tighter lies or deeper rough.  Doesn't matter.  You have to beat whoever shows up on that day.

You're not accounting for times, or margin of victory.  What about course records?
I want the focus to be on the head-to-head competition, not the times.  Course records are nice, but ultimately meaningless.  You don't get more credit in golf for winning by 10 shots than winning in a playoff.  A win is a win.  Also, comparing times across courses--just like comparing golf scores across courses--doesn't work.

Your race ratings are terrible.
Yeah, well, that's like, your opinion, man.  This is obviously the most subjective part of the system.  I live on the East Coast, so there's probably some local bias involved.  And I certainly can't keep track of 1500 races and know which are necessarily the most important.  What I'd like to do in the future is have a committee of folks spread out around the country, so I can have people responsible for rating races in their home region.  Let me know if you want to volunteer.  When we monetize this thing we'll all be rich.

How come all the timed events/track races are rated so low?
That's not 100% true, but I'll admit, the track events generally are receiving lower ratings than their road and trail counterparts.  My explanation is that, in the current climate, these races are not as highly regarded, and the fields are (usually) much weaker.  This isn't to say that some of the stuff Zach Bitter and Joe Fejes are doing isn't incredibly impressive or historically important.  But the truth is that less people are paying attention to, and talking about, these accomplishments than they are dissecting results from Leadville or Lake Sonoma, and that less of the top runners are showing up at these events.

What about FKTs/solo record attempts?
There's no way to account for these in the system, which I am OK with.  As I've stated before, this is about head-to-head competition deciding who the best runners are.  I don't want to be in the position of deciding whether Zack Bitter's 12-hour record is more impressive than Rob Krar's R2R2R FKT or Mike Wardian's treadmill 50K.

In reality, I think all of these things that we're talking about--FKTs, course records, national bests--are fodder for voting, not rankings.  Which is great.  I find the UROY vote fascinating, and I'm not saying we should replace that vote.  This ranking is meant to be an objective supplement to that subjective process.  Golf has the WGR which is completely objective, and the Player of the Year vote which is completely subjective.  You can use whatever criteria you want to value when you're voting.

You should use an average, not a cumulative score.  Without an average, there's no penalty for running poorly or DNFs.
I struggled with this decision for awhile.  This is where I deviated from the WGR, which uses an average.  In the end, I decided an average for our sport simply didn't work.  First of all, I wasn't comfortable with setting a minimum amount of races to qualify--that seemed way too arbitrary to me.  Secondly, from a logistic standpoint, it was almost impossible.  I'd have to comb through all the results of every single race and record zeros for anyone who didn't earn points for that race, just so I could average that race in later if they happened to record points--just not doable.  Plus, how would I count slower, non-scoring performances vs. DNFs?  You'd like to reward finishing, I guess, so if non-scoring finishes are worth zero points, should DNFs result in losing points?  And then, how would I track DNFs at all?  Most race results don't list them.  If I can't track them, it might encourage people to DNF, rather than record a slower finish.  (The Ultrasignup rankings have run into this issue.)  Finally, some people use low-key races as training runs, or social events.  I don't want to discourage this practice by penalizing people for participating in a race without actually racing it.  Ultimately, cumulative points was the only way to go.

You do a terrible job with international races and international runners.
I'll admit this is the one of the biggest problems I'm having right now.  These are US rankings--God knows I can't do world rankings, though it'd be fun--but there are plenty of top US athletes racing overseas in big races, and I need to account for their results.  And since I'm not keeping track of international runners (except in certain cases when I know they'll run a bunch of US races) the field strength of these races isn't as robust as it probably should be, so the multiplier isn't as significant as you'd want it to be. These races aren't as important on the domestic level as they are overseas, so maybe, it's not as big a deal as I think it is, but I'll readily admit this is a problem that I haven't solved, and I'm open to suggestions.

Level 4 and 5 races are undervalued in points as opposed to levels 1, 2, and 3.
And this is the other problem.  Again, I based this off of the WGR, making level 5 races akin to the majors, level 4 in line with large events like the WGC or the Players, Level 3 some of the medium-sized PGA tour events, Level 2 a small PGA tour event, and Level 1 a mini-tour event. At baseline, winning a level 5 event is worth five times as much as a Level 1 event...and likely more, since the chance for having a field strength multiplier is much higher.  These are approximately in line with the ratios the WGR follows.  But the more I look at it, the less sure of these numbers I am.  Is winning Western States really just five times as important as winning a podunk 50K?  Should it be worth ten times as much?  Or twenty?  I'm a little too far into this now to change for this year, but next year I might need to tweak the relative values.  I could fix this by adding more levels, but I think parsing the different races between levels is going to get maddening.  (I mean, States is a 10, but is Leadville a 9?  Is Vermont a 6, 7, 8, what?  Too complicated.)  Probably the larger races will simply be worth more points.  (Incidentally, I do like the numbers of scoring slots for each level, which are 3, 5, 10, 15, and 25 respectively.  These seem about right and I'm pleased I got that right on the first try.)

ANYWAY...here are the first set of rankings, through May 31.  We're getting into the summer racing season now, when big events start coming more frequently, so I'm going to try to update these maybe every couple of months.  If you like, you can view the entire list here.  Sheet 1 is a list of all the races, with rankings and field strength multipliers.  Sheet 2 is my reference for how points are distributed and how multipliers are calculated.  Sheet 3 is men and Sheet 4 is women.  I have it listed alphabetically by first name, so you can find your name there.  Sorry, I don't have it set up to view the entire list in numerical order.  I'll figure out how to do that at some point I'm sure. Probably. Maybe.

Through May 31


Men
State
Points
Women
State
Points
1
Alex Varner
CA
52.6
Magdalena Boulet
CA
77
2
Ryan Bak
OR
48
Stephanie Howe
OR
65.5
3
Brian Rusiecki
MA
46.2
Nicole Studer
TX
55.6
4
Paul Terranova
TX
45.5
Cassie Scallon
CO
46.6
5
David Laney
OR
43.9
Aliza Lapierre
VT
41
6
Dylan Bowman
CA
42
Jacqueline Palmer
DE
37
7
Chikara Omine
CA
40
Kathleen Cusick
VA
34
8
Mario Mendoza
OR
38
Traci Falbo
IN
33.8
9
Rob Krar
AZ
35.7
Caroline Boller
CA
32.6
10
Jorge Maravilla
CA
34.6
Katalin Nagy
FL
32.5
11
Jorge Pacheco
CA
32.8
Sarah Bard
MA
31.225
12
Benjamin Stern
CA
31.2
Ashley Erba
CO
30.9
13
Jared Hazen
CO
30
Megan Roche
CA
30
14
Jean Pommier
CA
30
Melanie Fryar
TX
29
15
Justin Houck
WA
28
Bree Lambert
CA
27
16
Andrew Miller
OR
26
Amy Sproston
OR
24
17
Ian Sharman
CA
25
Angela Shartel
CA
24
18
Scott Breeden
IN
25
Meghan Arbogast
CA
23.225
19
Alex Nichols
CO
24.8
Rachel Ragona
CA
23
20
Christopher Dannucci
CA
24.8
Laura Richard
CA
22.5
21
Christian Gering
CO
24.25
Nuria Picas
ESP
21
22
Karl Schnaitter
CA
24
Tracie Akerhielm
TX
21
23
Tim Tollefson
CA
22.5
Lindsey Tollefson
CA
20.975
24
Seth Swanson
MT
22.2
Kaci Lickteig
NE
20.275
25
Ben Nephew
MA
22
Amanda Basham
OR
20
26
Daniel Hamilton
TN
21
Camille Herron
OK
20
27
James Blandford
PA
21
Joelle Vaught
ID
20
28
Nate Polaske
AZ
21
Megan Stegemiller
VA
20
29
Jason Leman
OR
20.6
Michelle Yates
CO
20
30
Fernando de Samaniego
CA
20.3
Silke Koester
CO
19.4
31
Jim Walmsley
MT
20.3
Emily Richards
NV
19
32
David Kilgore
FL
20
Kerrie Bruxvoort
CO
19
33
Ford Smith
TX
20
Julie Fingar
CA
18
34
Mike Bialick
MN
20
Ashley Lister
PA
17.8
35
Patrick Smyth
UT
20
Amy Rusiecki
MA
17
36
Zach Ornelas
MI
20
Jennifer Edwards
WA
17
37
Ryan Smith

19.5
Catrin Jones
Can
16.8
38
Zach Bitter
WI
19.5
Robin Watkins
DC
16.5
39
Lon Freeman
CA
19
Gia Madole
OK
16
40
Owen Bradley
AL
19
Suzanna Bon
CA
16
41
Adrian Stanciu
CO
18.5
Emily Harrison
AZ
15.6
42
Jason Lantz
PA
17.35
Kathy D’Onofrio
CA
15.6
43
Bob Shebest
CA
17
Kerrie Wlad
CO
15.2
44
Jared Burdick
NY
16.8
Leslie Howlett
UT
15.2
45
Brandt Ketterer
CO
16
Alicia Woodside
Can
15
46
Catlow Shipek
AZ
16
Amie Blackham
UT
15
47
Charlie Ware
AZ
16
Beth Meadows
TN
15
48
Karl Meltzer
UT
16
Claire Mellein
CA
15
49
Ray Sanchez
CA
16
Jennifer Benna
NV
15
50
Mario Martinez
CA
15.9
Jessica Lemer
WI
15




Joanna Masloski
CO
15




Megan McGrath
NJ
15

All right!  Let the ad hominem attacks on my character begin!

Race Report: Cayuga Trails 50 Mile

Photo: Ron Heerkins
I came into the Cayuga Trails 50, which doubles as the US National 50-mile Championship, off of one of the best training blocks I've had in recent years--a six-week stretch of over 650 miles with some excellent workouts on both the roads and the track.  In the weeks leading up to the race, I was extremely excited and confident.  I couldn't wait to get back to Ithaca and run the beautiful trails of Treman and Buttermilk Falls State Parks, to compete with my MPF/RNR teammates, and hopefully put up a national-class result.  Six days before the race, unfortunately, the family and I were in a pretty good-sized car accident (we're all ok, thanks!  A little sore, but no major injuries.  No, it wasn't the new car; it was Jodi's car, which was eleven years old and had over 200,000 miles, so she's going to get a new one.) and so my final week of preparation wasn't quite what I had hoped.  But between some ART from Scott Field at Performance Sports and Wellness, some electrical stimulation from Greg Cecere at Momentum Physical Therapy, and some excellent massage from my good friend Angi Williams, I was able to make it to the start with some soreness in my ribs but otherwise ready to go.

I graduated from Cornell in 1997 and so Ithaca holds a very special place in my heart.  I had run the inaugural CT50 two years ago, and I knew that my friend Ian would put on another world-class event.  Plus, this was one of the big races for the Mountain Peak Fitness/Red Newt Racing team.  Many of my teammates were gathering in Ithaca to test ourselves against some of the best in the country.  Ian hosted a pre-race dinner for the team at his house on Saturday night, and I had a great time meeting some of my new teammates and catching up with some old friends as my kids ran around with Ben's and Ian's in the backyard.

Race morning was overcast and a bit humid, but with temps in the mid-50s, nearly perfect conditions (though the trails were a little soggy from recent rain).  My warmup was OK; my ribs were tender from the accident but didn't feel as though they would limit me much, and my legs felt absolutely ready to go.  We took off at 6am, the start feeling a bit more controlled than it had two years ago, which had felt like an all-out sprint to the mile mark; I settled into a quick but comfortable tempo, about twentieth place, running with Brian Rusiecki and several others at the tail end of the lead pack.  We strung out pretty quickly, and by about the ten-minute mark I was running with just one or two others as we started to climb the steps past our first gorge to AS1.

The requisite elevation chart.  Yeah, it's as bad as it looks.
The CT50 course is an unrelenting beast.  It's more or less a double out-and-back, with four major climbs per lap, a total of 10,000 feet of elevation gain.  The footing is generally superb--a mixture of double-track, some paved roads, and a ton of technical but eminently runnable singletrack.  And steps.  Oh, my god, the steps; hundreds of them per climb; thousands over the course of fifty miles.  It's a brutal course because almost the entire thing is runnable but extremely hard.  You rarely get a break from going uphill or downhill, and when you do, you feel like you need to take advantage of it and hammer.  And that's a tough combination.  In three years, only five runners have ever broken seven hours, and they're some of the best ultramarathoners in the country: Sage Canaday, Chris Vargo, Matt Flaherty, Jordan McDougal, and Mario Mendoza.

My point is, it's not a PR course.  In 2013, I had run 8:48 for 16th place.  My goal this year was eight hours, which was a pretty good bet to be in or close to the top 10; I thought even with an OK day I was in shape to run 8:15-8:20.  Anything outside of 8:30 or a top-15 finish was, frankly, going to be a disappointment.  Ideally, I'd like to try to run even splits, but on a course like Cayuga, this is incredibly difficult; since there is obviously no respite in the second half, some slowdown is almost inevitable.  I set a target of 3:45-3:55 for the first lap, which would give me a bit of a cushion to slow down by 10% or so over the second half and still have a shot at that 8:00-8:15 goal.

I climbed the first section well and reached AS1 (5K) in 26:30, a little faster than I wanted to be, right with Scotie Jacobs, a MPF/RNR teammate and the facilities manager for the Ithaca Beer Company.  Scotie and I don't know each other well, but he is easy company, and a very strong runner, and we attacked the next section of the course with a bit too much enthusiasm.  Scotie was definitely pushing a little faster than I would have otherwise, but I was feeling great, and I was so excited to be not just racing--finally, after all that prep--but racing with a teammate, and went along for the ride.  We hit AS2 (seven miles) at 59:30--way too fast.  As Scotie said, though, at this race, you have to take what the course gives you, because it doesn't give you much.

Climbing with Scotie.
Photo: Ron Heerkins

I settled in.  The miles clicked by pretty easily.  I pulled away from Scotie and ran solo for awhile, feeling in control; he caught back up and pulled a bit ahead on the bomber descent down to the base of Buttermilk Falls, the quarter pole for the race (1:50 and change, still a little fast but seemingly in control).  We immediately started climbing back out of the gorge, passing through the aid station without stopping; I hadn't stopped at an aid station yet and wasn't planning to for awhile.  We saw Elizabeth and Joe Azze within the first half mile of the climb; Joe chased us with his video camera as Scotie and I ran what I thought was a pretty solid ascent of the gorge.




Just past the top I pulled away again and was running solo; I felt great and focused on running a sustainable tempo for the second quarter of the race.  I picked off a couple of spots and before I knew it I was heading back toward the start/finish line at the end of lap 1, hitting the turnaround in a near-perfect 3:49 (1:50/1:59), in 17th place.

On my way out to start the second lap, two problems became quickly apparent:

1. There were about ten runners, including Scotie and our teammate Ryan Welts, tailing me by about five minutes or less.
2. I was starting to get really, really tired.

The first problem wasn't a big deal.  I didn't have any room for error, but I wasn't far from where I wanted to be either; Cole, Carlo, and Silas were running ninth through eleventh, and I wasn't more than ten minutes behind them.  Both my time and place goals were within reach with a strong second half.  The second problem was obviously going to be an issue, but my legs still felt pretty good.  Nutritionally, I was on top of things.  My stomach felt fine, I was well-hydrated.  If I could run close to two hours for the third quarter of the race--giving up about 1 minute per mile to my time from that segment of lap one--I'd be in good shape.  I was definitely walking more now, but was still making solid progress.  I saw Ian just after AS6, which I reached 30 minutes after leaving the start/finish, having surrendered my minute per mile.  I could tell from his expression that I still looked OK.  Fake it until you make it, I thought, and pushed  on down past Lucifer Falls.  I hit AS7 in 5:01, 72 minutes since the turnaround and a little slower than I wanted, but hanging on.  Legs still OK.

photo: Ron Heerkins

It was on the descent into Buttermilk Falls nearly an hour later that I knew I was in trouble.  Until then I had been holding it together--leaking minutes, to be sure, but I had actually picked up another spot or two, and was maintaining about 10 minute/mile pace over some pretty difficult terrain.  But as I started the descent I could tell my quads were not going to hold on for another 13 miles.  I hobbled downhill, each step becoming more and more painful; I tried to open up the stride to remove the "braking" element from my quads, but couldn't maintain the turnover.  I reached the aid station at 6:01, still technically on pace for an eight-hour finish, though that obviously wasn't going to happen.  My three quarters of the race had now gone roughly 1:50, 2:00, 2:10.  Could I run a 2:20 for the final quarter, maybe salvage an 8:20 and hang on to my top-15 finish?

In a word: no.

There's not much to say about the last 12.5 miles beyond the fact that it sucked.  I walked, limped, hobbled, spent a miserable 160 minutes out there just trying to move forward.  My quads were so shot that on the final stair climb up Lucifer Falls, with about five miles left in the race, I literally questioned whether I could get up the staircase.  I lost eleven spots in the last 12 miles and it's a miracle it wasn't more.  My quads felt like they had been through a meat grinder; I couldn't run uphill or downhill, and could manage a slow jog on the rare flat stretches.  By the time I stumbled into the finish chute I didn't really care how poorly it had gone, I just wanted it to be over.

Is he laughing at me?  I think he's laughing at me!
Photo: Joe Azze
Later, after I had a little time to reflect, I obviously did care, and was obviously pretty unhappy.  My 8:40 was eight minutes faster than I had run in 2013, but it was at least 20-30 minutes slower than I thought I was capable of.  The first half of the race had been great, and I had hung very tough through 37 miles, but it's a 50-mile race, and with the training block I'd had, I was bitterly disappointed with the finish.  Nutritionally things seemed to go pretty well, and the failure was less of a dietary/bonking issue than my legs just not being up for that pace on that course.  Looking back on my training, the one missing element was hills; I get plenty of climbing in on my daily runs, but didn't focus on hard hill workouts, doing most of the quality work on the roads and track.  Maybe that was the issue.  I don't know, I'm kind of out of answers.  As well as I feel like I can run a 50K, I feel pretty lost at the 50 mile distance right now, and I really don't feel any closer to an answer than I did the last time I ran this race two years ago.  Maybe 50 miles is just too far for me.  (I hope not, I'm running my first 100K in September.)


For now, recovery, and a quick rebuild before the Whiteface Skyraces at the end of this month.  All hills between now and then.  I'm not expecting much; I can't imagine the course will suit me particularly well, and I have to let Ryan beat the crap out of me on a course like this since he was a good sport and came to a "runnable" one last weekend.  So hopefully it'll just be a fun weekend with Jodi and my teammates.  As disappointed as I was with this race, it really was great running on a team again, encouraging each other on the course, feeding off the great support from Joe, Elizabeth, and Ian.  That's what I'll take away from this race and look forward to next time.

Goofing around a bit, before things started getting ugly.
Photo: Joe Azze
Almost forgot, quick gear report: Patagonia racing kit courtesy of MPF/RNR; Orange Mud HydraQuiver Single Barrel (continues to perform brilliantly) and trucker hat (I know it's cool, 'cause Kevin Bartow was wearing one too); Shoes: split time between the Salming Trail T1 and the Montrail Fluidflex.  Nutrition: GU Brew and Roctane, as usual.  The Sea Salt Chocolate gets a big thumbs up!